Business as Unusual: Crossing the boundaries of the known

In the Business as Unusual course, which is part of the Information Services Design programme at Masaryk University, we are currently working on an assignment that forces us to reconsider everything we have previously taken for granted about economic organizations.

📝 The Assignment

The task is to design an entirely new model of economic organization that transcends the boundaries of traditional business thinking. This is not merely about improving the existing system but rather about boldly exploring entirely new possibilities—finding ways in which the economy can bring meaning and value in a broader context.

The Business as Unusual course does not limit itself to conventional views on the economy or organizations. It encourages us to think about deeper questions: What role does an economic organization play in society? What values does it create? And what should it even mean?

The assignment poses several fundamental questions that aim to create a “radically” new concept:

• What metaphors or symbols can represent an organization that “functions completely differently”?
• How can an organization establish relationships with communities, companies, or individuals, etc., to move beyond the mere “logic of transactions”?
• How can ownership and management be defined so that they are collective, fair, and meaningful?
• What values should the organization create, and why should it even exist?
• And so on.

This approach forces us to step outside the comfort zone of conventional thinking.

🧠 What Thoughts Guide Me?

In formulating my proposal, I focus on three key ideas that help me transcend conventional thinking:

• Value Beyond Financial Profit: I am thinking about what value means if it is not defined only in financial terms. Could it be ecosystem regeneration, community strengthening, or the spread of knowledge?
• New Forms of Relationships: I am considering how an organization could function in relationships that are not based on transactions but on mutual support and growth.
• Structures Without Traditional Ownership: I am exploring possibilities for collective governance, where the organization is not the property of one person or corporation, but exists for its purpose.
• And I might also try some other ideas 🙂

This work gives me the opportunity to explore the economy as a space for creating new values—not only financial but also cultural, environmental, and social. I believe that such models have the potential to respond to the challenges we face today and open the way to a more sustainable and meaningful future.

🔍 At the Beginning of the Journey: Divergence of Thoughts

I am currently in the first phase of the double diamond process – the divergent part (More about the double diamond methodology can be read here: „Design Council. (n.d.). The double diamond.“, „UX Planet. (2020, June 25). Double Diamond Design Process and Its Variations.“, „Design Council. (n.d.). Framework for innovation.“, „Doing Projects Wiki. (n.d.). Double Diamond in Project Management.“). This phase is the moment when everything opens up. The prompts given in the Business as Unusual course are guiding me to map out a wide range of possible concepts. The assignment challenges me to create a new model for economic organization, and at this point, my goal is to explore as many paths and approaches as possible without limiting my imagination.

Exploring Possibilities and Laying the Foundations

In the divergent phase, I focus on exploring a wide spectrum of ideas, using various perspectives and sources of inspiration. The given dimensions, such as new metaphors, relationships, or the meaning of existence, guide me to ask questions that break traditional ways of thinking. For example, I think about how an organization could function without a purely transactional logic, focusing more on regeneration and sharing.

I find inspiration in natural ecosystems, community models, and technological innovations that introduce new ways of collaboration. This process is not just about finding specific answers, but rather about creating a space where unexpected ideas and connections can emerge.

While I give myself the freedom to search and discover, I am aware that some ideas will be abandoned over time. However, each idea, no matter how small it seems, contributes to the overall picture and forms the foundation for the next phases. Divergence is thus not only about generating possibilities but also about openness and the courage to think differently.

---

🎨 Diversity of Concepts: A Wide Spectrum of Ideas from Which I Will Select

At this stage, I am focusing on various areas that inspire me and could serve as the foundation for my final proposal. I am looking for new paths and connections, using my imagination to cover as broad a range of topics as possible, which I perceive as significant not only for myself but also for society at large. The diversity of approaches and ideas allows me to think in broader contexts and look for surprising links between seemingly distant worlds.

Key areas (which could be numerous) that I am currently considering:

• 🕊️🌍 Diversity – Openness to New Directions: This is just an initial selection of areas. New ideas may emerge later due to fresh stimuli or deeper reflection, further expanding this range.
• 🏳️‍🌈❤️ LGBTQIA+: The issues of equality and inclusion within the LGBTQIA+ community have long intrigued me. How could a new economic model contribute to actively supporting this community and ensuring equal opportunities?
• 🛡️💻 Cybersecurity: My professional experience leads me to consider an organization that bridges innovation with security. Could security be not only a foundation but also a driving force for development and growth?
• 💻📄 Digitalization of the Czech State: Efficient and accessible digital public administration is crucial for modern society. I am interested in a model that would provide citizens with better services and higher efficiency.
• ✌️🌍 Contributing to Resolving the Russian Invasion of Ukraine and Global Wars: How can an economic organization contribute to conflict resolution? I am exploring ways it could support peace through systemic actions—such as humanitarian aid, technological support, or innovative financing.
• ⚖️🕵️‍♂️ Ethical Hacking: Ethical hacking, which involves using hacker methods to protect systems and detect weaknesses, is a specific area I see as important. I haven’t included it under cybersecurity because it represents its own domain focused on active defense and proactive solutions. It also connects technical knowledge with an ethical framework and has the potential to contribute to the public good beyond traditional security, such as uncovering corruption or preventing digital fraud.
• 🔄➕ And More

Openness to new directions remains crucial, as new stimuli or topics may emerge at any time, completely shifting the direction of this project. This flexibility allows me to respond to unexpected challenges and take into account a wider spectrum of inspirations.

---

As I progressively formulate a broad spectrum of concepts for a new economic organization, I approach their random re-evaluation using six key criteria. This approach allows me to identify the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for further development of each idea. The criteria include:

• Transcending Boundaries (A): I focus on whether the ideas push beyond conventional ways of thinking and open up space for innovative and bold scenarios.
• Engagement in Discourse (B): I assess whether the ideas resonate with current societal issues and have the potential to inspire or engage others.
• Originality (C): I evaluate how unique and unpredictable the proposals are, aiming to avoid conventional solutions.
• Dimensions of the Concept (D):
  • What symbol, metaphor, or idea best represents the concept?
  • How would the organization collaborate with others and introduce innovative forms of relationships?
  • Does the management and ownership structure differ, aligning with modern approaches?
  • What purpose does the organization serve for the community or society, and what value does it bring?
• Feasibility (E): I assess whether the proposal is sufficiently developed and has the potential to be implemented, even at a basic level.
• Creativity and Boldness (F): I look for whether the ideas are daring and innovative, offering new perspectives and approaches.

This process helps me not only sort the ideas but also explore ways to develop and test them. The result will be a list of concepts that have undergone this analysis and have potential for further development.

Basic Overview of Ideas to Be Developed in the Next Part of the Article:

🕊️🌍 Various:

1. Resource Sharing Network
2. Local Time Economy
3. Universal Skills Bank
4. Decentralized Energy Cooperatives
5. Regenerative Investment Ecosystem
6. Reciprocal Hospitality Economy
7. Urban Micro-Economies
8. Ecosystem Restoration Corporation
9. Knowledge Sharing Economy
10. Food Waste Regenerative Network

🏳️‍🌈❤️ LGBTQIA+:

11. The Queery Network
12. Circular Queery Economy
13. Queery Metaverse
14. The Queery Academy
15. Queery Advocacy Hub

🛡️💻 Cybersecurity:

16. Cybersecurity Co-Op
17. Vulnerability Sharing Network
18. Decentralized Cyber Defense Network
19. Cybersecurity Academy for Marginalized Groups
20. Values-Based Cybersecurity Ecosystem

💻📄 Digitalization of Czechia:

21. AI-Governed Public Service Portal
22. Blockchain-Based Participatory Budgeting
23. National Digital Innovation Lab
24. Public Service Digital Accelerator
25. National Digital Sandbox
26. National Digital Forum
27. State Digital Transformation Fund

✌️🌍 Addressing the Russian Invasion of Ukraine and Solving/Preventing Global Conflicts:

28. Peace and Recovery Cooperative
29. Support for Local Businesses
30. Infrastructure Reconstruction
31. Energy Independence
32. Education and Digitalization
33. War Refugee Repatriation Program
34. Peace Diplomacy Fund
35. Peaceful Sustainable Development Economy
36. Mutual Dependency and Transitional Cooperation Economy
37. Isolation Sanctions and New Global Alliances Economy
38. Economy of Destruction and Reorganization: Total Isolation with Global Interest Transformation
39. Global Peace Assurance and Military Conflict Elimination Economy
40. Global Peace Transformation Economy and UN Reform

⚖️🕵️‍♂️ Ethical Hacking:

41. The Economy of Ethical Hacking for Digital Peace and Justice
42. The Economy of Digital Autonomy: Hacking for Global Freedom and Justice

This initial overview of diverse proposals has emerged from my free-flowing thoughts and various interests, without an attempt to seek synergy between them. The evaluation criteria and spec

---

🕊️🌍 Various

💡 1. Resource Sharing Network

Concept/Metaphor:
“Digital Guild” – a modern adaptation of the historical guild concept, where skills and resources were shared among community members. The network utilizes technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) to create a fair and efficient system for sharing tools, skills, and time.

External Relationships:
The network connects individuals, small businesses, and local communities on a global scale. Through a digital platform, users can share excess resources or offer their skills and expertise. Transparency and trust are ensured by a blockchain system that records transactions and contributions from members. Additionally, the platform integrates a review system that strengthens accountability and mutual trust among community members.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is collectively owned and managed by the community members. Each user has voting rights, allowing democratic decision-making on key issues such as sharing rules or the use of profits. For global scalability, delegated voting can be used, where representatives at the community level vote on behalf of a larger group of members.

Value:
This model minimizes waste, promotes local self-sufficiency, and helps build community skills. It also facilitates access to expertise on a global level, enabling more effective collaboration across different regions. The network also strengthens ecological values by reducing the need for new resources and promoting sustainable behavior.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept goes beyond the traditional sharing economy by integrating modern technologies like blockchain and AI. The historical metaphor of the guild is a powerful symbol of community collaboration, providing an emotional connection that could engage a broad audience.
• Challenges: In addition to ensuring the technological infrastructure, it is important to carefully design mechanisms that support long-term sharing and fair participation from all members.
• Feasibility: The model can be easily piloted on a local level, for example in community centers or urban districts, and then scaled up to a global level.

This proposal not only redefines the shared economy but also introduces a new framework for community collaboration that is sustainable, equitable, and technologically advanced.

💡 2. Local Time Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Hour as Currency” – a system in which time is the primary equivalent of value. Every hour of work or service has the same value, regardless of its type, thus strengthening equality among participants and eliminating economic discrimination.

External Relationships:
Communities at the local level exchange services and skills based on time. Technology, such as mobile apps, enables the recording and tracking of transactions, with a focus on personal interaction and trust-building. Members can provide various services, such as repairs, tutoring, or healthcare, and earn time credits, which can then be exchanged for other services within the network.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is owned by the community and managed in a decentralized manner. Each member has an equal stake in governance, and the system’s rules are determined collectively through democratic processes. Time exchange rules are set transparently to prevent abuse or imbalances.

Value:
This system promotes solidarity, equality, and cooperation at the local level, thereby increasing community cohesion. It removes economic barriers, encourages individual participation in community life, and offers an alternative to traditional currency-based systems.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The “hour as currency” concept provides a radical alternative to monetary systems, while avoiding the predictability of traditional barter models by integrating modern technology.
• Challenges: Trust among members and protection against abuse will be crucial. It may be beneficial to introduce service verification mechanisms and a reward system for long-term engagement.
• Expansion Potential: The model can be linked to regional or global networks, allowing time credits to be exchanged between communities. Futuristic elements like gamification or the use of augmented reality (AR) could increase user engagement and attractiveness.

Feasibility:
This concept can be easily piloted in a smaller community or urban district. A mobile app with an intuitive interface could facilitate transaction tracking and enhance user-friendliness. Collaboration with local organizations, such as schools, cultural centers, or healthcare institutions, would increase the practical impact and reach.

This proposal offers a new perspective on an economy based on equality and solidarity, which not only supports social cohesion but also presents a realistic and attractive alternative to traditional monetary systems.

💡 3. Universal Skills Bank

Concept/Metaphor:
“School for All” – an open and accessible educational platform that eliminates financial, geographic, and social barriers to acquiring skills. The platform functions as an education center, a hub for community collaboration, and a space for knowledge sharing, where every participant can contribute their experience, volunteer, or share resources.

External Relationships:
The platform is funded by partners such as universities, businesses, and government organizations, who gain access to talents, projects, and innovations generated through user collaboration. Users can engage not only as students but also as mentors, contributors to projects, or organizers of community activities. This collaboration fosters mutual benefit: students gain skills, partners receive innovations, and the community thrives on mutual support.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform operates as a non-profit organization with collective governance, where representatives of students, teachers, partners, and communities participate in decision-making structures. Decision-making processes are transparent and democratic, ensuring equal representation of the interests of all involved. The platform’s management uses digital tools to enhance efficiency and transparency.

Value:
This model provides education for everyone, regardless of their economic situation, background, or location. It promotes lifelong learning, increases access to skills, and creates a community environment where people can share knowledge, collaborate on problem-solving, and strengthen social cohesion.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept transforms the traditional education model by adding dimensions of voluntary collaboration and community ownership. Personalized learning paths, supported by AI, could enhance the appeal and effectiveness of learning.
• Challenges: A key issue remains the motivation of partners and the effectiveness of decentralized management. Consider mechanisms to ensure active involvement from all stakeholders.
• Technological Innovations: Gamification, the use of blockchain for transparent data management, and tracking individual learning journeys could enhance the platform’s functionality.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be initiated at the regional level, for example, in collaboration with local universities, community centers, and tech companies. Gradual integration of additional partners would allow scalability and the expansion of the platform into a broader network. Leveraging existing educational technologies could reduce initial costs and facilitate implementation.

This proposal revolutionizes education by combining open access, community values, and modern technologies. It offers a pathway to creating an inclusive and dynamic educational system for the 21st century.

💡 4. Decentralized Energy Cooperatives

Concept/Metaphor:
“Energy from Neighbors” – a decentralized energy model in which individuals and businesses can produce and share energy with the community. Blockchain technology ensures transparency, fair distribution of surpluses, and monitoring of consumption, bringing energy closer to people’s everyday needs.

External Relationships:
The cooperative connects individuals, small businesses, and local governments, which collaborate to share energy surpluses, such as from home solar panels, wind turbines, or other renewable sources. Municipal and regional governments can support the cooperative through grants or providing infrastructure, such as charging stations for electric vehicles. The blockchain platform tracks all transactions, ensuring trust and fair distribution of surpluses among members.

Governance and Ownership:
The cooperative operates on the principle of democratic governance, where every member has an equal vote when making decisions about prices, investments, or building new infrastructure. Energy sources are collectively owned by the community. Digital tools, such as delegated voting and AI, can help manage more complex decision-making processes in larger cooperatives.

Value:
This model increases the energy independence of communities, reduces reliance on large energy corporations, and promotes the sustainable use of local resources. The cooperatives also contribute to reducing emissions and promoting eco-friendly thinking. At the same time, they allow people to actively participate in the management and governance of energy resources.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The decentralized energy model with community ownership is an innovative alternative to centralized energy systems. Blockchain technology adds transparency and trustworthiness, while democratic governance brings energy closer to people.
• Challenges: Ensuring trust and fairness among members can be challenging, especially in larger cooperatives. Mechanisms for conflict resolution and fair profit distribution will be key.
• Technological Innovations: The integration of AI for optimizing energy production and consumption, or dynamic pricing based on demand, could increase the system’s efficiency. Gamification could motivate members to engage more and adopt eco-friendly behaviors.

Feasibility:
The concept is easily implementable at the local level, for example, in rural areas or urban districts with access to renewable energy sources. Pilot projects could start with a smaller number of members and gradually expand. Existing blockchain technologies and renewable energy sources make the model feasible today.

This proposal represents a transformative approach to energy, combining sustainability, self-sufficiency, and community collaboration. It offers solutions to both ecological and economic challenges, making energy more accessible and fair for all.

💡 5. Regenerative Investment Ecosystem

Concept/Metaphor:
“Investing in Life” – an innovative investment system focused on long-term projects that have a positive impact on nature and society. Instead of maximizing financial profits, it emphasizes regeneration, restoration, and sustainability, thus creating lasting value for ecosystems and communities.

External Relationships:
The ecosystem connects investors, non-profit organizations, and businesses through transparent platforms. Investors fund projects such as landscape regeneration, biodiversity restoration, community gardens, or sustainable infrastructure. Non-profits and businesses act as project implementers, while investors track their impact using open tools, such as blockchain. The platform fosters collaboration and knowledge sharing among all stakeholders.

Governance and Ownership:
Projects are owned and managed by the communities that directly benefit from their success. A hybrid governance model allows the involvement of all parties: investors receive a small but stable return, while communities retain autonomy in decision-making about projects. Transparency is ensured through digital tools that enable tracking contributions and impacts.

Value:
The regenerative investment ecosystem promotes ecological restoration and social cohesion through projects that combine economic, environmental, and social benefits. This model transforms the traditional perception of investment value by focusing on long-term positive impacts instead of short-term financial gains.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept transcends traditional investment models by emphasizing regeneration and sustainability. Transparent management through blockchain and community involvement in project ownership enhances its credibility and appeal.
• Challenges: A key issue will be defining accountability and transparency mechanisms between communities and investors. Consider introducing AI tools for predicting long-term ecological impacts of projects.
• Inspiration: An example could be a wetland restoration project, which not only improves biodiversity but also helps retain water in the landscape, contributing to climate change adaptation.

Feasibility:
This concept is easily implementable at a smaller community level, for example, through pilot projects focused on regenerating specific locations. Blockchain technology ensures transparency in funding and impact monitoring, which builds trust among the involved parties.

This model brings a transformation to the field of investment by changing fundamental motivations and redefining economic value for the benefit of nature and society. It offers a practical and scalable approach to addressing global ecological and social challenges.

💡 6. Reciprocal Hospitality Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Host and Host” – a system inspired by the human experience of hospitality, where each participant alternately provides and receives resources or services. This model creates a cycle of mutual support and sharing, strengthening solidarity and a sense of community.

External Relationships:
The model connects individuals, businesses, and communities on the principle of reciprocity. Shared resources may include housing, workspaces, transportation, educational opportunities, or material goods. The platform tracks commitments and transactions using blockchain, ensuring transparency and trust among participants. Each member has an obligation to “return hospitality”, for example, by providing services or contributing to a collective goal.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is decentralized and managed by the participants themselves, who share ownership and the right to make decisions about its operation. Transparent mechanisms such as community voting and tracking contributions ensure equality and fairness. Sanction mechanisms could be introduced for those who fail to fulfill their commitments.

Value:
The reciprocal hospitality economy reduces waste from underutilized resources, promotes interpersonal relationships, and creates space for meaningful interaction among community members. At the same time, it contributes to ecological and economic thinking by maximizing the use of existing resources.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept takes traditional hospitality to a systemic level and combines it with technologies like blockchain, ensuring transparency and fairness.
• Challenges: A key issue will be managing commitments and ensuring active participation from all members. Implementing reward and penalty mechanisms could improve the balance between providing and receiving.
• Technological Innovations: AI could assist in efficiently matching resources with needs, while gamification could motivate participants to become more engaged.

Feasibility:
This model can be easily piloted in local communities, such as neighborhood associations or within corporate environments, where office spaces, transportation, or educational activities could be shared. A blockchain platform would provide easy tracking of commitments and ensure transparency.

Application Example:
A community could create a network of shared resources, where members offer temporarily unused spaces or help organize events, while also earning the right to access services from other members, such as shared office spaces or consulting.

This proposal redefines the concept of sharing and reciprocity as the foundation for a sustainable and socially connected economy. It supports responsible resource use, interpersonal trust, and collaboration, making it attractive and practical in various contexts.

💡 7. Urban Micro-Economies

Concept/Metaphor:
“City as an Ecosystem” – each neighborhood or city block functions as an interconnected microeconomic unit that produces, exchanges, and shares resources within small local ecosystems. Every part of the city is viewed as a living organism that contributes to the overall sustainability and resilience of the urban structure.

External Relationships:
Local communities share resources such as food, energy, services, and skills through a decentralized economy. Each neighborhood may create its own “local currency” that circulates locally, supporting the local economy. These micro-economies are interconnected into a larger network that allows for the exchange of resources and knowledge between communities, fostering mutual self-sufficiency and collaboration.

Governance and Ownership:
Micro-economies are managed by community councils made up of local residents. These councils work with urban designers and planners to help optimize resource use and design sustainable solutions. Ownership of resources and infrastructure is shared, and every community member has an equal vote when making decisions on key issues.

Value:
This model strengthens the self-sufficiency and resilience of local communities, reduces environmental impact, and increases social cohesion. The introduction of local currencies supports the circulation of wealth within the community, while decentralization reduces reliance on centralized economies, increasing cities’ resilience to global crises.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The “city as an ecosystem” concept brings a radical shift in urban planning and economic approaches. Urban currencies and interconnected micro-economies create a decentralized structure that promotes local self-sufficiency and collaboration.
• Technological Innovations: The use of smart sensors and AI can help manage and optimize the flow of micro-economic activities. Blockchain technology can be applied for the transparent management of urban currencies and resources.
• Challenges: A key challenge will be ensuring equal representation of all community members and efficiently managing complex systems. Mechanisms should be considered to enable easy integration of new members and conflict resolution.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be implemented in a selected urban neighborhood or small city where urban currencies, community management of resources, and the connection of individual micro-economies would be introduced. Technologies such as digital maps of needs and resources or blockchain for tracking transactions could significantly enhance the efficiency of implementation.

Application Example:
A community in a selected neighborhood could introduce a local currency that supports local entrepreneurs while allowing residents to pay for services such as repairs, classes, or childcare. Energy surpluses could be shared between neighbors, while local markets support the exchange of food and crafts.

This model transforms the way cities function by building on decentralization, sustainability, and community participation. It offers a modern and practical solution to increasing the self-sufficiency and resilience of urban communities in the context of current global challenges.

💡 8. Ecosystem Restoration Corporation

Concept/Metaphor:
“Ecological Corporation” – an economic model that transforms positive environmental impacts into economic value. This approach redefines profit to reflect ecological benefits such as ecosystem restoration, making it the foundation for economic transactions.

External Relationships:
The model connects individuals, businesses, and non-profit organizations that jointly finance and implement ecosystem restoration projects, such as reforestation, water conservation, or soil revitalization. Participants are rewarded with “ecological credits,” which can be used as currency or exchanged for benefits such as tax relief, discounts on eco-friendly products, or access to other services. Blockchain technology tracks the contributions and ensures transparency.

Governance and Ownership:
Projects are managed by non-profit organizations, cooperatives, or communities in collaboration with experts. A participatory funding model ensures that investors receive a share of the environmental benefits, while local communities maintain autonomy. Transparent governance minimizes the risk of corruption and builds trust among all parties.

Value:
This model supports environmental responsibility by linking economic activities to sustainability. Profit is redefined to reflect direct benefits for nature and society, moving the economy towards long-term sustainability and regeneration.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: Ecological credits introduce a new way to measure and reward environmental contributions. This model replaces traditional capitalist principles with a value system focused on restoration and regeneration.
• Technological Innovations: Blockchain ensures transparency and tracking of project impacts. AI could be used to predict ecological benefits or optimize project selection.
• Challenges: A key issue will be defining how ecological credits function, including their tradability, and establishing clear rules for managing projects and distributing benefits.

Feasibility:
The model is easily applicable to smaller pilot projects, for example, in regions where ecosystem restoration initiatives are already in place. Partnering with local businesses and government incentives, such as grants or tax relief, could accelerate implementation. Blockchain and other technologies make the model efficiently implementable.

Application Example:
A company could initiate a reforestation project in degraded land, where individuals and businesses invest in tree planting. Ecological credits would reflect the amount of CO₂ captured and could be used to reduce tax liabilities or traded on a platform with other participants.

This concept changes how we perceive value, placing responsibility to nature at the heart of economic activity. It offers a practical, scalable, and technology-supported path to creating a more sustainable and regenerative economy.

💡 9. Knowledge Sharing Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Instead of money, knowledge” – an innovative economic model where the primary value is the sharing of know-how, skills, and mentoring. This system replaces traditional currency with knowledge as the medium of exchange, promoting innovation, education, and community collaboration.

External Relationships:
The platform connects individuals, businesses, educational institutions, and organizations that offer or need knowledge. Users can “pay” by sharing their skills, such as providing consultations, hosting workshops, or mentoring. Knowledge can be shared in various forms, such as videos, webinars, articles, personal lessons, or advisory services. This model fosters interaction across different sectors and communities, creating a dynamic network of mutual collaboration.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is collectively owned and managed by the community of users. Rules for the exchange of knowledge and the method of rewarding contributors are defined democratically. Blockchain technology ensures transparency and fair allocation of “knowledge credits,” which can be used for accessing other services on the platform or exchanged for other benefits.

Value:
The model removes economic barriers to accessing education and expert knowledge. It supports equality, collaboration, and skill development, leading to the accelerated spread of innovation and strengthening the community spirit. By placing knowledge at the center of the economic system, it contributes to sustainable and inclusive development.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept shifts the traditional economic paradigm by replacing money with knowledge. This redefines the meaning of wealth and creates new opportunities for sharing and collaboration.
• Technological Innovations: AI can be used to personalize knowledge search and matching, while gamification increases user motivation to contribute and engage. Blockchain provides transparent tools for tracking and rewarding contributions.
• Challenges: A key issue will be ensuring fair assessment and recognition of all contributors. Reward and incentive mechanisms will be crucial for long-term sustainability.

Feasibility:
A pilot project can be launched at universities, community centers, or among businesses looking for alternative ways to educate and collaborate. Leveraging existing online educational platforms and tools for tracking contributions can facilitate implementation and quickly demonstrate the model’s benefits.

Application Example:
A company seeking marketing expertise can receive advice from an expert, who “earns” credits for this service. The credits can then be used to access workshops on team skill development or mentoring in technology. In this way, knowledge circulates, creating value for the entire community.

This model transforms the economy by placing education and collaboration at its core. It offers an inclusive and sustainable alternative to traditional capitalist systems, opening new possibilities for global knowledge sharing.

💡 10. Food Waste Regenerative Network

Concept/Metaphor:
“From Waste to Value” – an economic model that transforms food waste into a valuable resource. The network connects suppliers of surplus or “unsellable” food with community centers that redistribute it, process it into new products, or use it for energy production or natural fertilizer.

External Relationships:
Restaurants, supermarkets, and farms supply surplus food to community centers. These centers redistribute the food to those in need or process it into products such as canned goods, dried items, or prepared meals. The network also incorporates innovative technologies, such as biogas stations or composting facilities, that convert remaining unusable waste into energy and natural fertilizers. Partnerships with local governments and non-profit organizations ensure effective management and connection with communities.

Governance and Ownership:
The network combines public and community ownership. Key roles are played by community centers and local governments, which coordinate the redistribution and use of food waste. Private investors can be involved in building necessary infrastructure, such as biogas stations or storage facilities. Transparency is ensured through decentralized digital tools, such as blockchain, that track the movement and processing of food waste.

Value:
This model contributes to a significant reduction in food waste, improves food access for disadvantaged communities, and supports regenerative agricultural practices. By converting waste into value, it strengthens the circular economy and sustainable access to food resources.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The model transforms food waste into a source of value while supporting sustainability, social equality, and innovation in the food economy.
• Technological Innovations: AI could be used to predict waste volume and optimize logistics, while blockchain ensures transparent tracking and management of waste flows.
• Challenges: A key issue will be solving the logistics of food redistribution and ensuring a balance between public and private sector interests. Collaboration mechanisms between various stakeholders will be crucial.

Feasibility:
Pilot projects could be implemented in cities where food banks are already operational. The integration of biogas facilities and composting systems can be coordinated with local governments and investors. Utilizing existing infrastructure and technologies, such as digital platforms for tracking donated food, increases feasibility.

Application Example:
A supermarket donates surplus food to a community center, which redistributes it through local meal programs. Unusable food is composted or converted into biogas, which provides energy to community facilities, such as schools or hospitals.

This model demonstrates how waste can be transformed into a valuable resource and how economic, ecological, and social goals can be interconnected within a single system. It offers a scalable and sustainable solution to the global issue of food waste.

---

🏳️‍🌈❤️ LGBTQIA+

💡 11. The Queery Network

Concept/Metaphor:
“Global connection of the queer community” – a decentralised network that connects queer communities both locally and globally, enabling mutual collaboration, knowledge sharing, and resource exchange. The network uses modern technologies such as blockchain and decentralised applications (dApps) to ensure transparency and effective decision-making.

External Relationships:
The network connects queer communities on both local and global levels. Local centres share knowledge, resources, and experiences, while digital tools facilitate collaboration across continents. Blockchain ensures transparency in financial flows and resource distribution, and decentralised applications enable efficient decision-making and coordination, thereby strengthening trust between different communities.

Governance and Ownership:
Each cooperative is managed by its members with equal voting rights. Decision-making processes are democratic, with decentralisation allowing for fair involvement from all members. The global level of the network uses delegated voting to ensure effective coordination without compromising the autonomy of individual cooperatives.

Value:
The network creates safe spaces for queer individuals, supports social justice, cultural exchange, and economic self-sufficiency. It offers an innovative way to connect LGBTQIA+ communities and strengthens solidarity on a global scale. By leveraging technology, it reduces barriers and enhances inclusion.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The Queery Network transcends traditional LGBTQIA+ community support by establishing a decentralised global network that uses blockchain and dApps, ensuring transparency and efficiency.
• Challenges:
  The main challenge is the implementation of technological solutions and ensuring long-term trust among members. Mechanisms for voting, resource-sharing rules, and protection against system abuse will need to be defined.
• Expansion Potential:
  The network can leverage AI to tailor services to individual communities or use gamification to increase member engagement. Global cooperation could also involve linking with other organisations that support human rights.

Feasibility:
A pilot project can be launched within regional queer community networks, which will create a foundation for global connection. Existing technologies, such as blockchain and decentralised applications, are accessible and feasible for the concept. Further steps include the detailed design of technological infrastructure and organisational models.

The network has the potential to redefine approaches to supporting LGBTQIA+ communities and become a model example of global solidarity and technologically advanced inclusion.

💡 12. Circular Queery Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Circular Queery Economy” – a circular economy within the queer community where resources, energy, and materials circulate within the community. This model integrates support for local LGBTQIA+ entrepreneurs, recycling and resource regeneration, creating a self-sustaining ecosystem. The inspiration comes from combining circular economy principles with queer solidarity, giving this concept a unique framework.

External Relationships:
The ecosystem connects LGBTQIA+ entrepreneurs, local producers, and community members. Through a digital platform, members can share resources, track material flows, and contribute to sustainability. The network supports queer businesses by integrating their products and services into the daily functioning of the community (e.g., cafes, shops, or craft workshops). Transparency is ensured through blockchain, while recycling and regenerative processes minimise environmental impact.

Governance and Ownership:
The community collectively owns and manages all aspects of the system. Every member has a vote in decision-making processes through digital tools that allow for equal participation. Blockchain technology serves as the foundation for transparent governance, tracking members’ contributions to the circular model (e.g., recycling or resource sharing) and rewarding active participants.

Value:
The model contributes to the economic independence of the queer community by supporting local businesses and minimising economic barriers. It also brings environmental benefits through recycling and resource regeneration. The community gains self-sufficiency, a safe environment, and a solidarity-based system that connects queer identity with ecological and economic values.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept combines circular economy with queer solidarity, creating a unique ecosystem that supports both economic self-sufficiency and sustainability. Digital platforms and blockchain provide a futuristic dimension to the model.
• Challenges:
  Key challenges include organising material flows, creating logistical infrastructure, and ensuring equal involvement from all community members. It will be crucial to implement mechanisms that prevent imbalances or abuse of the system.
• Expansion Potential:
  The ecosystem can be expanded to larger regions or connected with other community networks, allowing for the exchange of resources and experiences among queer communities globally. Technologies such as AI or gamification could streamline logistics and increase member engagement.

Feasibility:
The model can be implemented as a pilot project in a specific locality or community. For example, a network of queer entrepreneurs could be linked to local community centres and recycling initiatives. Blockchain technology and digital platforms are accessible tools that could facilitate implementation. Next steps include a detailed plan for financing, logistics, and community member engagement.

The Circular Queery Economy presents a progressive model that links queer identity with environmental and economic sustainability. This proposal could inspire not only LGBTQIA+ communities but also the broader society to adopt similar sustainable and solidarity-based economic systems.

💡 13. Queery Metaverse

Concept/Metaphor:
“Queery Metaverse” – a virtual world inspired by the physical concept of The Queery, providing a digital space for the queer community. This safe and inclusive virtual ecosystem enables the sharing of experiences, education, art, and networking, overcoming geographical and cultural limitations, and connecting queer individuals from all over the world.

External Relationships:
The virtual Queery connects queer communities globally through metaverse technology. It provides space for interactive activities such as workshops, panel discussions, art exhibitions, or mentoring programmes. Blockchain technology ensures transparency in financial flows, and decentralised applications support democratic governance. The virtual environment also facilitates networking between queer individuals and organisations.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is owned by the community and managed in a decentralised manner. Members have voting rights through blockchain tools and decide on the future development of the platform. Decentralised applications allow equal participation for all members, ensuring fair and transparent governance.

Value:
The concept provides an accessible, safe, and inclusive space for queer individuals, regardless of their geographical or cultural location. It supports education, cultural exchange, and the creation of global queer networks. The virtual space offers members opportunities to share their stories, develop projects, and build community in the digital world.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  Virtual Queery introduces a unique concept of a digital community space that combines queer solidarity with virtual reality and blockchain technologies.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring cybersecurity and accessibility of technologies for diverse user groups will be key. Mechanisms must be created to prevent misuse of the platform and ensure inclusion for users with limited access to modern technologies.
• Expansion Potential:
  The platform could include personalised features, such as AI to tailor content and activities, or gamification to motivate members to engage actively. Long-term development could involve connecting with physical community spaces or other digital queer projects.

Feasibility:
The concept is feasible using existing virtual reality technologies, blockchain, and decentralised applications. A pilot project could begin on a smaller scale, focusing on specific activities such as virtual educational programmes, mentoring, or art presentations. Over time, the platform could expand its functions and reach.

The Queery Metaverse presents a futuristic and innovative model for queer communities in the digital world. This concept redefines how queer solidarity and support can operate on a global scale, offering new opportunities for connection, education, and cultural enrichment within the community.

💡 14. The Queery Academ

Concept/Metaphor:
“The Queery Academy” – an educational institution created and managed by the queer community, providing an inclusive space for courses, workshops, and mentoring. The concept of democratic education positions community members as creators and facilitators of educational content, strengthening their voice and competencies.

External Relationships:
The Queery Academy connects queer communities locally and globally through a digital platform. Local events, such as workshops and meetups, complement a global online space that allows content sharing, discussions, and real-time interactive learning. This creates a diversified network that supports the exchange of knowledge across cultures and geographic boundaries.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform operates on democratic governance. Community members have the right to make decisions about content, priorities, and the direction of the academy. Blockchain technology supports transparency in the compensation of mentors and content creators, while the use of community credits motivates active participation and contributions to educational programmes.

Value:
The Queery Academy promotes queer solidarity and identity by providing access to knowledge not commonly available in traditional educational institutions. It also enhances both individual and collective competencies within the community, boosting self-esteem and engagement among members.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept introduces democratic education, where the queer community itself creates and manages content, distinguishing it from traditional educational institutions.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring the quality of content and equitable involvement from all community members will be crucial. Mechanisms for evaluation and support for less active members will need to be established.
• Expansion Potential:
  The Academy could incorporate personalised learning using AI, gamification to motivate participants, or a hybrid format combining physical and virtual learning spaces.

Feasibility:
The project can begin as an online platform using existing LMS (Learning Management Systems) technologies, tailored to the needs of the queer academy. Pilot programmes, such as online courses and mentoring, could be complemented by local workshops and meetups.

The Queery Academy presents an innovative approach to education, emphasising inclusion, solidarity, and the empowerment of the queer community. This model can serve not only queer communities but also inspire broader society to adopt democratic and inclusive educational systems.

💡 15. Queery Advocacy Hub

Concept/Metaphor:
“Queery Advocacy Hub” – a political and advocacy platform that connects the queer community with campaigns for LGBTQIA+ rights, social justice, and equality. The platform serves as a centre for coordinating political initiatives, advocacy activities, and collaboration with activists and organisations, amplifying the queer voice in the public sphere.

External Relationships:
The platform connects the queer community with activists, NGOs, political initiatives, and the general public. Digital tools enable the mobilisation of members to support campaigns, organise petitions, or public events. The Queery Advocacy Hub provides educational resources for political leaders, institutions, and the broader society, raising awareness of queer issues and the impacts of discrimination.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is managed democratically through decentralised applications (dApps), ensuring equal participation from all members. Decision-making on campaign priorities and resource allocation is transparent thanks to blockchain technology. This model supports participation and builds trust in the decision-making process.

Value:
The Queery Advocacy Hub strengthens the active participation of the queer community in public and political life. It offers tools and spaces for advocacy, campaigns, and education, contributing to long-term societal change. The platform also increases the visibility and representation of queer voices in the political arena.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept links the queer community with advocacy work and political activism, going beyond traditional community centre roles. The use of blockchain and dApps brings an innovative governance and transparency model.
• Challenges:
  A key challenge will be resolving conflicts of priorities between different interest groups and ensuring that all voices are given equal weight. Cybersecurity and data protection are also critical concerns.
• Expansion Potential:
  The platform could include AI tools for analysing legislative data and predicting the impact of proposed policies. A global expansion would allow connecting queer communities with similar platforms worldwide.

Feasibility:
The project can be launched at a regional level, focusing on specific legislative change or advocacy campaign. Pilot initiatives could include training for queer activists or organising petitions using blockchain. Digital tools and the current availability of dApps ensure the feasibility of this concept.

The Queery Advocacy Hub redefines how the queer community can influence societal and political change. This model inspires the integration of cultural, economic, and political activities, making it a unique example of queer solidarity and advocacy on a global scale.

---

🛡️💻 Cybersecurity

💡 16. Cybersecurity Co-Op

Concept/Metaphor:
“Security from the community, for the community” – a cybersecurity cooperative that provides services focused on protecting the data and systems of smaller organisations, non-profits, and individuals. The model is based on resource sharing and collaboration, ensuring the availability and quality of services without high costs.

External Relationships:
The cooperative provides cybersecurity services such as audits, training, implementation of protective measures, and consulting, focusing on smaller organisations, non-profits, and individuals. It organises community events and educational programmes aimed at raising awareness about cyber threats and acquiring basic security skills. Thanks to the cooperative model, the services are affordable, allowing involvement from those who cannot afford expensive commercial solutions.

Governance and Ownership:
The cooperative operates on a democratic principle – each member is also a co-owner and has a vote in decision-making about the direction of the cooperative. Profits are shared among members or reinvested into improving services. Transparent governance is supported by digital tools such as blockchain and voting applications, ensuring fairness and equality.

Value:
The cooperative provides high-quality, affordable cybersecurity services to communities that otherwise wouldn’t have access to the necessary protection. It raises awareness about cyber risks, supports education, and creates a safer digital environment, thus strengthening trust and stability at the community level.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The cooperative model that connects community solidarity with expert cybersecurity services presents an innovative approach, distinct from traditional commercial solutions.
• Challenges:
  A key challenge is ensuring sufficient capacity to meet demand and balancing democratic decision-making with technical leadership. Protecting sensitive data and preventing system abuse are also crucial.
• Expansion Potential:
  The cooperative could involve students and emerging professionals who can build their careers here. Expansion could include remote service provision or partnerships with other cybersecurity organisations.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be launched at a local level with a smaller group of members and gradually grow. Technologies such as digital platforms and remote collaboration tools ensure the efficiency and accessibility of services. Emphasis on educational programmes can help engage the broader community and raise awareness about cyber threats.

The Cybersecurity Co-Op presents a progressive model that combines democratic governance, community collaboration, and expert services. This concept has the potential to redefine the approach to cybersecurity and inspire other community initiatives in the field of digital protection.

💡 17. Vulnerability Sharing Network

Concept/Metaphor:
“Security as a Shared Effort” – a digital platform that allows communities to share information about cyber vulnerabilities, their solutions, and best practices. The model is based on collective protection and collaboration, enhancing the effectiveness of combating cyber threats.

External Relationships:
The network brings together small and medium-sized businesses, developers, public institutions, and individuals. Through a secure platform, members share information on newly discovered vulnerabilities, analyses, and corrective actions. Users have access to experts, case studies, educational materials, and best practices. The platform also ensures quick exchange of technical details, facilitating an effective response to threats.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform operates on a participatory governance model, where members decide on priorities, such as the focus of analyses or resource allocation. Transparency is ensured through blockchain technology, which allows tracking of decision-making processes and resource distribution. This model supports equality and engagement of all members in the governance of the network.

Value:
The network enables rapid detection and resolution of cyber vulnerabilities, protecting members from digital threats. The collective approach saves costs, increases security awareness, and promotes innovation. The model also strengthens trust and collaboration between organisations and individuals.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept of a shared security platform, based on a participatory model and transparency, offers an innovative solution to cyber challenges.
• Challenges:
  A key challenge is ensuring the protection of sensitive information shared on the platform and creating mechanisms to resolve conflicting priorities. Building trust among network members is also essential.
• Expansion Potential:
  The network could be focused on specific sectors, such as healthcare or education. Advanced technologies, such as AI for vulnerability analysis or automatic alert mechanisms, could increase the platform’s efficiency.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be launched within smaller communities or sectors where collaboration is key. Technologies such as secure digital platforms and blockchain ensure technical feasibility. The first step could involve creating a small test environment for sharing specific vulnerabilities and solutions.

The Vulnerability Sharing Network redefines the approach to security as a collective effort. This innovative model increases resilience against threats and strengthens solidarity between organisations and individuals, making it an inspiring example for other areas of collective collaboration in the digital world.

💡 18. Decentralized Cyber Defense Network

Concept/Metaphor:
“Cyber defense without borders” – a decentralised network that connects individuals, businesses, and organisations to share security resources, data, and expertise. This model leverages a collective approach to defending against cyber threats through shared computing power, advanced tools, and collaboration.

External Relationships:
Members of the network contribute resources such as computing power, technical know-how, or data and gain access to tools for malware detection, threat analysis, encryption, and automated patches. The network supports the exchange of information and experiences, thus increasing collective resilience to threats. Collaboration between members enables more effective responses to cyberattacks.

Governance and Ownership:
The network is managed decentralised through blockchain technology, ensuring transparency and equality among contributors. Each member has a stake in decision-making and can influence the priorities and direction of the network’s development. This model supports democratic governance, where contributors gain voting rights based on their participation.

Value:
The network provides democratised access to advanced security tools that are otherwise available only to large organisations. It benefits smaller entities and individuals who lack the resources for their own cyber defence. The model increases collective resilience to cyber threats and strengthens collaboration across sectors and regions.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The decentralised shared cybersecurity model is an innovative alternative to traditional centralised solutions. The use of blockchain and distributed computing power brings transparency and efficiency.
• Challenges:
  The main challenge is ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing the misuse of contributed resources. It will be crucial to establish quality standards and conflict resolution mechanisms among members.
• Expansion Potential:
  The network could be targeted at specific sectors such as healthcare or education, or focus on specific types of threats. The involvement of artificial intelligence would enable automated analysis and resource allocation based on current needs.

Feasibility:
Technological feasibility is ensured thanks to existing blockchain and distributed computing technologies. A pilot project could be launched in a specific sector or geographical region to test the effectiveness and interest in this model. Gradual expansion could follow based on feedback from the first members.

The Decentralized Cyber Defense Network presents a groundbreaking approach to cybersecurity, based on solidarity, sharing, and collective responsibility. This model has the potential to transform the way communities and organisations collaborate to defend against cyber threats, and inspire further areas of decentralised cooperation.

💡 19. Cybersecurity Academy for Marginalized Groups

Concept/Metaphor:
“Protection through Education” – an educational organisation focusing on marginalised and vulnerable communities, providing the tools and skills needed to address cyber threats. The academy combines education, hands-on training, and community support to strengthen digital security and reduce digital inequality.

External Relationships:
The academy collaborates with technology companies, non-profit organisations, and educational institutions, which contribute expertise, funding, or technical tools. Graduates of the academy become cybersecurity ambassadors within their communities, helping to implement the knowledge and skills they have gained. Partnering technology firms can provide internships, mentoring, or access to state-of-the-art tools and technologies.

Governance and Ownership:
A participatory governance model includes members from the target communities and academy graduates. They provide feedback and take part in planning and improving the programmes. Transparency and democratic decision-making are ensured through digital tools such as blockchain or voting platforms, which reflect the needs and interests of the community.

Value:
The academy strengthens the cybersecurity resilience of marginalised communities and improves their safety in the digital environment. It also offers participants practical skills that are valuable in the job market, helping to bridge the digital divide and promote equality in access to modern technologies.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept connects cybersecurity education with community empowerment, focusing on groups that are often overlooked. The combination of theoretical education, practical workshops, and involvement of technology partners makes this model unique.
• Challenges:
  A key challenge will be securing sustainable funding and engaging a sufficient number of experts. It is also important to tailor the programmes to the specific needs of different communities and maintain long-term motivation among participants.
• Expansion Potential:
  The academy could incorporate gamification, real-life cyberattack simulations, or hybrid educational formats combining online and physical workshops. Engaging alumni in mentoring new participants can strengthen the community element and promote sustainability.

Feasibility:
The project is feasible due to the availability of online educational platforms that allow for broad reach and low operational costs. A pilot project could be launched in a specific geographic area or focused on a particular target group, such as women in technology or minorities facing increased cyber threats.

The Cybersecurity Academy for Marginalized Groups represents an innovative and socially responsible educational model that promotes digital inclusion and resilience. This concept not only enhances cybersecurity protection for marginalised communities but also contributes to their economic and social empowerment.

💡 20. Values-Based Cybersecurity Ecosystem

Concept/Metaphor:
“Security with a Human Dimension” – an innovative economic model that connects cybersecurity services with the promotion of values such as sustainability, social justice, and transparency. Organisations exchange cybersecurity services for their commitment to implementing ethical principles, making cybersecurity a tool for broader societal change.

External Relationships:
The ecosystem involves businesses, non-profit organisations, and other entities that “pay” for services such as risk analysis, training, or security design by adopting specific commitments (e.g., implementing environmentally sustainable practices or improving working conditions). Transparency and monitoring of these commitments are ensured through blockchain and regular evaluations. Companies that successfully implement ethical principles gain access to additional benefits, including cybersecurity support or enhanced reputation in the market.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is managed by a community of cybersecurity experts and ethical hackers who ensure the quality of services and monitor adherence to commitments. Decision-making is democratic, supported by digital tools that ensure equality between the community and the organisations involved. Ownership is shared among the community members and organisations participating in the ecosystem.

Value:
This model shifts cybersecurity from a purely technical domain to one of social responsibility. It links increased cybersecurity resilience with broader societal and environmental goals, motivating organisations to operate more responsibly and sustainably. This creates a direct connection between security and values that are important for the future.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The integration of cybersecurity with ethical values and the substitution of financial transactions with the implementation of commitments makes this model innovative and distinct from traditional approaches.
• Challenges:
  A major challenge is the effective monitoring and evaluation of organisations’ commitment fulfilment. Tools need to be created to ensure fair evaluation and motivation for the long-term implementation of values.
• Expansion Potential:
  The model can be extended to a wider range of organisations and industries interested in sustainability and transparency. The incorporation of gamification could motivate organisations to implement values more quickly.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be launched with a group of companies already showing interest in sustainability or ethics. Blockchain technology will allow transparent tracking of commitments, while regular monitoring ensures the credibility of the entire process. The next steps include detailed design of mechanisms for tracking and rewarding organisations for implementing values.

The Values-Based Cybersecurity Ecosystem represents a revolutionary approach that redefines cybersecurity as a tool to support broader societal goals. This model offers inspiration not only for technology companies but also for a broader discussion about connecting technology with human values, creating a more sustainable and responsible ecosystem.

---

💻📄 Digitisation of the Czech Republic

💡 21. AI-Governed Public Service Portal

Concept/Metaphor:
“Digital Civil Servant” – a unified public service portal governed by artificial intelligence (AI) that automates bureaucracy and provides citizens with personalised and efficient solutions for administrative matters. The portal introduces simplicity, accessibility, and speed into interactions between citizens and public administration.

External Relationships:
The portal connects public institutions and integrates various databases, enabling citizens to handle a wide range of services online, from tax returns and vehicle registrations to benefit applications. Automated processing of requests eliminates the need for physical visits to offices, while personalised notifications and advisory services ensure improved communication between authorities and citizens. The portal also provides access to educational and healthcare programmes, thereby extending its scope to other areas of public services.

Governance and Ownership:
The portal is managed by an independent digital transformation agency under public oversight. Transparency in processes is ensured through blockchain technology, enabling every step of the request processing to be tracked while maintaining records of data usage. The open architecture allows citizens to monitor the system’s functioning and actively participate in its oversight and improvement.

Value:
The portal significantly simplifies access to public services, reduces bureaucracy, and saves time and costs for both citizens and public institutions. Automation of processes enhances efficiency and accuracy, while personalised services improve user experience and satisfaction with public administration.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept leverages AI not only for digitalisation but also for automation and personalisation of public services, elevating traditional e-government models to a new level.
• Challenges:
  The primary challenges include safeguarding sensitive data, ensuring cybersecurity, and guaranteeing equal access to services for all citizens. Mechanisms must also be developed to integrate various databases without compromising transparency or trust.
• Expansion Potential:
  The portal could include predictive analytics to proactively suggest actions citizens should take or integrate features such as virtual assistants and dispute resolution tools.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible due to existing technologies such as AI, blockchain, and digital identities. A pilot project could be launched at a regional level or focus on a specific area of services, such as healthcare or education. Further steps include developing a legislative framework for data protection and engaging citizens in system design.

The AI-Governed Public Service Portal represents the future of public administration – efficient, accessible, and citizen-oriented. This concept has the potential to transform interactions between public institutions and citizens, prioritising innovation, transparency, and democratic oversight, making it a progressive and beneficial project.

💡 22. Blockchain-Based Participatory Budgeting

Concept/Metaphor:
“Budget in Citizens’ Hands” – a decentralised platform that allows citizens to directly influence the allocation of public funds. Blockchain technology ensures transparency and fairness in decision-making, fostering trust between citizens and public administration.

External Relationships:
The platform connects citizens with local governments, technical experts, and non-profit organisations, who assist in designing and implementing projects. Citizens can propose specific projects, discuss them, and vote on their priorities. These projects may include infrastructure improvements, public space revitalisation, or support for community initiatives. Blockchain technology ensures the immutability of votes and transparency throughout the process.

Governance and Ownership:
The platform is managed by a non-profit consortium composed of technical experts, community representatives, and civic organisations. Citizens can monitor and influence the entire process, from project proposals to implementation, with blockchain ensuring openness and accountability in all transactions and decisions.

Value:
The model increases citizens’ involvement in public finance management, strengthening trust in public institutions. Transparency eliminates suspicions of corruption or manipulation, while decentralisation enables projects that reflect the actual needs of local communities. This approach improves the quality of public spaces and fosters a sense of community ownership.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  Decentralising public budgeting through blockchain presents an innovative way to enhance citizen participation and ensure transparency.
• Challenges:
  The main challenges are ensuring the platform is accessible to all citizens, including those less technologically adept, and creating mechanisms to manage conflicts of interest and diverse priorities.
• Expansion Potential:
  The platform could include gamification elements to motivate citizens to actively participate or utilise AI for analysing proposals and optimising fund allocation.

Feasibility:
The model is highly feasible at the local level, where a pilot project could allocate a specific portion of the budget for community projects. Blockchain technology ensures vote immutability and transparency, while an intuitive user interface facilitates citizen engagement. Next steps include platform development, public awareness campaigns, and testing in a specific municipality or region.

Blockchain-Based Participatory Budgeting redefines the management of public funds, granting citizens greater responsibility and influence in decision-making. This model not only enhances transparency and trust in public administration but also creates space for innovation and improved quality of life in local communities.

💡 23. National Digital Innovation Lab

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Lab for the Future” – a state-funded yet independent platform for collaboration among universities, startups, and government institutions, focused on developing and testing digital technologies. The aim is to accelerate digital transformation, improve public services, and support innovative solutions in various aspects of public life.

External Relationships:
The lab connects academia, the private sector, and public institutions, offering a collaborative space for partners to develop specific solutions such as tools for energy resource management, automation of legislative processes, or predictive traffic models. It also supports startups focused on digital innovations by providing access to public data, expert consultations, and technical infrastructure. Equal access is ensured by clear rules, and intellectual property protection is a priority.

Governance and Ownership:
The lab is managed by experts from the public and private sectors, with a supervisory board overseeing strategy and an operational team responsible for day-to-day activities. Transparency is a key principle – management and resource utilisation rules are publicly available, fostering trust among partners and the public.

Value:
The lab accelerates the digitalisation of public services, enhances their efficiency and transparency, and develops technologies with a direct impact on citizens’ quality of life. It creates a space for cross-sector collaboration, fostering innovation, knowledge sharing, and efficient resource use.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The lab combines state funding with independence and support for digital innovation. Introducing a sandbox for testing experimental solutions outside legislative constraints adds another innovative element.
• Challenges:
  The key challenges include ensuring fair access to data and resources and preventing preferential treatment of certain entities. Clear processes for project evaluation and financial allocation must also be established.
• Expansion Potential:
  The lab could expand into a national network with branches specialising in various fields such as healthcare, education, or transport. It could also serve as a model for international collaboration in digital innovation.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible, particularly in countries supporting digitalisation and innovation in public administration. A pilot project could be launched through a partnership between a university, a tech startup, and a municipal government. Next steps include designing specific collaboration processes, funding models, and mechanisms for measuring project impact.

The National Digital Innovation Lab redefines collaboration between the state, academia, and the private sector, offering a space for technologies that can fundamentally change the way public services are delivered. This model combines innovation, transparency, and shared responsibility, providing an inspiring foundation for digital transformation.

💡 24. Public Service Digital Accelerator

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Start-up Incubator for Public Administration” – a platform designed to connect public administration with external innovators, leveraging accelerator principles to fast-track the digitalisation of public services. The accelerator identifies key challenges in public administration and commissions their solutions from technology firms, universities, and other entities.

How It Would Work:

• Identifying Challenges: Each year, public administration sets several priority issues, such as digitalising processes, improving electronic communication, or enhancing public data management.
• Submitting Proposals: Technology firms, universities, non-profits, and individuals submit their proposed solutions.
• Project Selection: Selected projects receive funding, access to relevant public administration data, mentoring, and technical support.
• Implementation: Projects are developed in collaboration with public institutions, ensuring integration and sustainability of the outcomes.

External Relationships:
The platform links public administration with universities, technology firms, and non-profit organisations, fostering the sharing of expertise and technologies. Networking events and public outreach activities encourage broader participation from both the general public and professional communities. This model facilitates effective cross-sector innovation transfer and builds trust in the digital transformation of public administration.

Governance and Ownership:
The accelerator is managed by a non-profit organisation in collaboration with public and private partners. Transparent rules for project evaluation and funding ensure equal opportunities for all participants. Feedback from public institutions and citizens plays a key role in optimising processes and selecting future priorities.

Value:
The accelerator speeds up the digital transformation of public administration by engaging external experts and innovators to address specific problems. This model improves the quality and efficiency of public services, attracts new talent, and fosters collaboration between the public and private sectors. Transparency and citizen involvement enhance trust in public administration.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The combination of the agile approach of the private sector with the needs of public administration represents an innovative way to tackle the challenges of digital transformation.
• Challenges:
  Key challenges include ensuring equal opportunities for smaller or lesser-known entities and establishing clear rules for project evaluation and funding.
• Expansion Potential:
  The platform could incorporate hackathons and competitions to motivate broader public participation. Over time, the accelerator could expand to regional levels or focus on specific areas such as healthcare, education, or transport.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be launched with a limited scope, addressing one or two key challenges. Funding could be sourced from public funds and grants from technology partners. Further steps include creating a digital platform for submitting proposals and training participants on the principles of public administration.

The Public Service Digital Accelerator connects the creativity and agility of innovators with the needs of public administration. This concept has the potential to revolutionise the way public services are digitalised and inspire other countries to pursue similar projects. Its combination of participation, transparency, and technological innovation makes it both inspiring and practically implementable.

💡 25. National Digital Sandbox

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Space for Safe Experiments” – a regulated and controlled environment for pilot testing new digital technologies in public administration. This sandbox provides public administration and its partners with the opportunity to validate the functionality, safety, and efficiency of innovations before their deployment in real-world operations.

How It Would Work:

• Technology Testing: The sandbox would enable experiments with specific technologies, such as AI in the judiciary, predictive traffic models, or automated construction permits.
• Experiment Rules: Each experiment would be subject to clear rules ensuring safety, transparency, and ethical data use.
• Evaluating Results: Transparent mechanisms would involve cybersecurity, ethics, and public administration experts to assess the outcomes of experiments.
• Recommendations: Following testing, results and recommendations would be submitted to relevant authorities for decisions on further implementation.

External Relationships:
The sandbox would collaborate with universities, technology firms, non-profits, and independent experts in cybersecurity and ethics. A citizen advisory board would provide public feedback, strengthening trust in planned experiments. This collaboration would ensure professional oversight and support for effective and safe testing.

Governance and Ownership:
The sandbox would be managed by an independent institution with clearly defined rules for governance and operation. A supervisory board composed of experts and public administration representatives would oversee transparency, independence, and fair conditions for all participants.

Value:
The sandbox minimises risks associated with deploying new technologies, accelerates digital innovation in public administration, and enables the effective implementation of technologies that enhance public service quality. Transparent evaluation and safety protocols build trust among citizens and professionals in new technologies.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  A regulated space for technology testing with a focus on safety, transparency, and ethics is an innovative approach to accelerating digital transformation.
• Challenges:
  Key challenges include ensuring equal opportunities for all entities and clear processes for selecting experiments. Mechanisms must also be developed to integrate citizen voices into technology evaluation.
• Expansion Potential:
  The sandbox could be extended to regional levels or specific sectors such as healthcare, transport, or education. It could also include simulations of real-world conditions for testing innovations.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible in countries supporting the digitalisation of public administration. A pilot project could focus on a specific area, such as predictive traffic analysis or administrative process automation. Further steps include designing detailed sandbox rules, creating a transparent evaluation system, and engaging the public in monitoring experiments.

The National Digital Sandbox offers a safe environment for innovation, minimising risks while accelerating their implementation in public administration. This model combines technological innovation with ethical and safety principles, making it an inspiring and practical tool for digital transformation.

💡 26. National Digital Forum

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Digital Parliament” – a participatory platform that connects citizens, experts, and public administration to collaboratively design and evaluate digital services. The forum fosters active public involvement in building a digital state, strengthens citizens’ trust in public administration, and ensures digital services meet their needs.

How It Would Work:

• Proposals and Feedback: Citizens can propose new digital services, share feedback on existing systems, or suggest improvements via the platform.
• Expert Panel: The forum includes experts in IT, design, cybersecurity, and public administration who evaluate proposals and recommend steps for their implementation.
• Public Voting: Citizens vote on priorities, ensuring that implemented services align with their needs.
• Transparent Process: The platform publishes every step, from proposal submission to implementation, fostering transparency and trust.

External Relationships:
The forum collaborates with the IT community, academia, and civic initiatives, bringing in expertise, technical capabilities, and innovative approaches. This model engages a wide range of stakeholders and promotes diversity of perspectives. A citizen advisory board could provide feedback and ensure representation of various social groups.

Governance and Ownership:
The forum is managed by an independent institution that ensures transparency and equal conditions for all stakeholders. Clear rules define the process for evaluating proposals and decision-making. Transparent governance strengthens citizens’ trust in the platform and its impact on digital transformation.

Value:
The platform enhances citizen participation in shaping digital services, improving their quality and efficiency. A transparent process eliminates citizens’ sense of detachment from decision-making processes and builds trust in public administration. This model ensures digital services truly reflect public needs.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The concept combines democratic principles with digital tools, engaging citizens as key actors in creating digital services.
• Challenges:
  Mechanisms must be developed to engage diverse social groups and ensure equal opportunities for all citizens. Moderating proposals and ensuring their relevance will also be critical.
• Expansion Potential:
  The forum could incorporate gamification to encourage long-term citizen engagement or use AI to analyse trends in proposals and identify priorities.

Feasibility:
A pilot project could be launched in one sector, such as education or transport, where citizens propose and evaluate specific services. Existing technologies enable the creation of an intuitive online platform connecting citizens with experts. Further steps include designing the user interface, moderation mechanisms, and voting systems.

The National Digital Forum introduces a novel approach to digital transformation by placing citizens at the heart of public service development. This model strengthens trust, fosters innovation, and ensures the digital state is genuinely built on the needs and ideas of its users.

💡 27. State Digital Transformation Fund

Concept/Metaphor:
“Funding the Digital Future” – a state-managed fund dedicated to financing technological innovations that advance the digitalisation of public services. The fund acts as a financial and organisational tool to support projects that deliver direct benefits to citizens and improve the efficiency of public administration.

How It Would Work:

• Application Process: The fund would accept proposals from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), research institutions, universities, and non-profit organisations. Projects could focus on mobile applications, process automation, improved access to data, or innovations in cybersecurity.
• Project Evaluation: A transparent system would assess projects based on their benefits to citizens, cost-effectiveness, technological feasibility, and sustainability.
• Blended Financing: The fund would combine public funding, European funds, bank investments, and private sector contributions through “matching funds.”
• Transparency: The fund would publish information about funded projects, their progress, and outcomes, ensuring public trust.

External Relationships:
The fund collaborates with universities, technology firms, banks, and European funds, providing broad access to resources and expertise. Partnerships with private entities strengthen innovation, while public involvement in project evaluation promotes transparency and trust.

Governance and Ownership:
The fund is managed by an independent agency that ensures transparent rules for project evaluation and resource allocation. Clear mechanisms for financial oversight and accountability build trust among citizens and stakeholders.

Value:
The fund accelerates the implementation of innovations in public administration, supports small businesses and research institutions, and ensures that digital transformation delivers tangible benefits to citizens. Transparent processes eliminate opportunities for corruption and inefficient use of resources.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The integration of public funding with private investors in the context of digital transformation represents a unique approach that supports innovation and allows smaller entities to participate in state-led projects.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring equal opportunities for smaller firms and non-profit organisations may be challenging. Additionally, mechanisms must be developed to monitor the impact of projects and the efficiency of funding.
• Expansion Potential:
  The fund could include open calls where citizens vote on priority projects or support pilot initiatives in sectors such as transport, healthcare, or education.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible when combined with European funds and existing national grant schemes. A pilot project could focus on specific challenges, such as improving communication between citizens and public offices. Next steps include creating a simple online platform for project submission and evaluation.

The State Digital Transformation Fund provides an effective and transparent tool for supporting the digital transformation of public administration. By combining public and private resources, fostering innovation, and ensuring measurable benefits, this model builds public trust in state governance and delivers visible progress in digitalisation.

---

✌️🌍 Addressing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and resolving/preventing global conflicts

💡 28. Peace and Recovery Cooperative

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Collaborative Future” – a state-coordinated cooperative that facilitates financial and organisational support for initiatives aimed at post-conflict recovery and promoting sustainable peace. This model unites public and private resources to empower communities, rebuild infrastructure, and foster long-term stability.

How It Would Work:

• Grant Applications: The cooperative would accept proposals from small businesses, research institutions, universities, and non-profit organisations. Projects could include rebuilding social infrastructure, promoting inclusive economic growth, or implementing community-based peacebuilding programmes.
• Project Evaluation: A transparent system would evaluate proposals based on their social impact, cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and alignment with peace and recovery objectives.
• Blended Financing: Funding would combine public sources, international aid, and private sector contributions through co-investment models.
• Transparency: The cooperative would publish detailed reports on funded projects, their progress, and measurable outcomes to build trust and accountability.

External Relationships:
The cooperative would collaborate with academic institutions, global NGOs, international donors, and local community organisations to mobilise expertise, funding, and resources. Partnerships with the private sector would enhance innovation and effectiveness, while public engagement ensures transparency and credibility.

Governance and Ownership:
Managed by an independent body, the cooperative would operate with clear rules for project evaluation, resource allocation, and financial oversight. Governance mechanisms would include representatives from stakeholder groups, ensuring accountability and inclusiveness in decision-making.

Value:
The cooperative accelerates recovery efforts, supports sustainable community development, and promotes peace through inclusive participation. Transparent processes mitigate corruption risks, while coordinated funding ensures efficient use of resources for maximum impact.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The integration of public, private, and international resources in a unified framework for peace and recovery is a novel approach that leverages cross-sector collaboration.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring equitable access to resources for smaller organisations and implementing robust impact measurement systems are critical challenges.
• Expansion Potential:
  The cooperative could expand to include open calls for proposals with community voting mechanisms or focus on pilot initiatives in high-priority areas such as education, health, or local governance.

Feasibility:
The model is highly feasible, leveraging existing international aid mechanisms and public-private partnerships. A pilot project could focus on regions heavily impacted by conflict or natural disasters. Next steps include developing a user-friendly application platform and establishing clear operational guidelines.

The Peace and Recovery Cooperative represents a comprehensive approach to rebuilding and stabilising communities, combining financial support, participatory governance, and innovative solutions. This model aligns short-term recovery needs with long-term development goals, fostering resilience and sustainable peace.

💡 29. Support for Local Businesses

Concept/Metaphor:
“An Economy Built on Local Strength” – an ecosystem designed to support small businesses, particularly in conflict-affected areas, by preparing them for the digital economy and environmentally sustainable growth. This model combines financing, education, and global connectivity to foster innovation and economic stability.

How It Would Work:

• Microloans and Training: Local businesses would access microloans for development or expansion, supplemented by mentoring and training in digital skills such as e-commerce, digital marketing, and process automation.
• Global Connectivity: A platform would link local businesses with foreign investors and experts to aid in rebuilding infrastructure and driving innovation.
• Sustainability Focus: Infrastructure would support businesses focused on green technologies and eco-friendly innovations to ensure sustainable development.
• Online Marketplace: A digital platform would serve as a marketplace for local products, offering logistical support, expert consultancy, and marketing advice.

External Relationships:
The programme would work with investment funds, start-up incubators, and universities to provide funding, training, and expertise. Government agencies would offer administrative support and facilitate access to grants, while international organisations and tech firms would enable access to new technologies and global markets.

Governance and Ownership:
The initiative would be managed by an independent organisation in collaboration with government and private sector partners. Transparent processes for fund allocation and fair resource distribution would foster trust among entrepreneurs and the public.

Value:
The model strengthens local economies by supporting the growth of small businesses, increasing employment, and enhancing economic stability. A focus on environmental sustainability and digital transformation prepares businesses for future challenges, contributing to long-term growth and resilience.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The combination of microloans, mentoring, digital education, and global connectivity is an original and forward-thinking approach to supporting local businesses.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring equal access for businesses in remote areas and creating efficient resource distribution and impact monitoring systems are key challenges.
• Expansion Potential:
  The programme could expand to include targeted support for green innovation projects or establish an international network to promote the export of local products.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible, leveraging existing tools such as microloans and start-up programmes. A pilot project could focus on regions affected by conflict, where economic development needs are most pressing. Next steps include creating a digital platform and introducing educational courses and support programmes.

The Support for Local Businesses initiative provides comprehensive support for small businesses through financing, education, and global partnerships. This model promotes economic stability, sustainable growth, and community resilience to global challenges.

💡 30. Infrastructure Reconstruction

Concept/Metaphor:
“Building Roads to the Future” – a focus on rebuilding critical infrastructure as the foundation for economic growth and sustainable living conditions for citizens. This approach integrates innovative and eco-friendly technologies to ensure long-term stability and resilience.

How It Would Work:

• Rebuilding Key Areas: Projects would target the restoration and modernisation of schools, hospitals, transport systems, and energy infrastructure. Sustainable and innovative technologies would be central to ensuring ecological responsibility and efficiency, such as installing solar panels on schools or deploying eco-friendly building materials in public structures.
• Efficient Construction: Projects would be supported by public-private partnerships (PPPs) to ensure efficiency, transparency, and diversified funding sources. These partnerships would facilitate risk-sharing and secure financing from both public and private sectors.
• Sustainable Implementation: All projects would aim for rapid yet sustainable progress, using project management aligned with environmental standards to ensure long-term infrastructure resilience.

External Relationships:
Collaboration with infrastructure firms experienced in rebuilding and modernising critical systems would be essential. Partnerships with international organisations and financial institutions would provide technical expertise and funding for large-scale projects.

Governance and Ownership:
Governed by an independent body, projects would follow transparent processes for planning, funding, and oversight. Partnerships would ensure equitable resource distribution, accountability, and alignment with national and international development goals.

Value:
Infrastructure reconstruction enhances essential services and living conditions, contributing to long-term societal and economic stability. The integration of sustainable technologies fosters resilience to climate change and ensures resource-conscious development for future generations.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality:
  The integration of sustainable and innovative technologies into infrastructure projects offers a forward-looking approach to reconstruction.
• Challenges:
  Ensuring equitable access to resources and transparent allocation of funds while balancing rapid implementation with long-term sustainability are key challenges.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible through a combination of partnerships and international financial tools. A pilot project could focus on areas where infrastructure recovery is most critical, such as post-conflict regions. Detailed project phase planning and transparent funding mechanisms would ensure effective implementation.

The Infrastructure Reconstruction initiative provides a roadmap for sustainable recovery, integrating innovation, environmental responsibility, and collaborative approaches to rebuilding the foundations of society.

💡 31. Energy Independence

Concept/Metaphor:
“Power for the Future” – an initiative to invest in renewable energy sources aimed at reducing reliance on Russian energy supplies. This model revitalises Ukraine’s energy sector through modern, environmentally friendly technologies, strengthening energy security, stability, and ecological recovery.

How It Would Work:

• Development of Renewable Energy Sources: Solar, wind, and biomass power plants would be established across Ukraine. These facilities would form part of a broader strategy to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on fossil fuels and imported energy.
  Example: Solar and wind farms would be built in areas with the highest potential for renewable resources, bolstering Ukraine’s energy self-sufficiency.
• Engagement of Local Communities and Businesses: Local communities, businesses, and farmers would participate in the production and distribution of renewable energy. This would include installing solar panels on residential and commercial rooftops and supporting local biogas plants. The initiative would also create jobs in the renewable energy sector.
  Example: Installation of solar panels and small biogas plants for local farmers, enhancing energy independence and generating new job opportunities.
• Integration of Innovative Technologies: Modern technologies, such as advanced battery systems and smart energy grids, would be employed to ensure efficient use, storage, and distribution of energy. These solutions would help balance supply and demand while increasing system reliability.
  Example: Implementation of smart grids for efficient energy distribution and battery systems for storing surplus energy, particularly in areas with intermittent production (solar, wind).

External Relationships:

• Partnerships with Technology Companies: Collaborations with firms specialising in renewable energy technologies would be crucial for implementing and maintaining systems such as solar panels, wind turbines, and biomass generators.
• Cooperation with the EU and International Organisations: The EU could provide funding and technological support through green funds and ecological recovery initiatives. International energy organisations and banks would play a vital role in securing stable financing for projects aimed at rebuilding energy infrastructure.

Value:
The primary value of energy independence lies in enhancing Ukraine’s energy security and reducing its reliance on geopolitical adversaries, a critical factor for the country’s stability. The model also contributes to reducing environmental impact and advancing ecological recovery, positioning Ukraine as a leader in global climate initiatives and sustainable development. Renewable energy sources diversify the energy portfolio, ensuring stable and sustainable power for the future.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The Energy Independence concept redefines traditional energy policy by integrating renewable energy sources at a national level while prioritising ecological sustainability and security. Further developments could include the establishment of local energy hubs as models for regional self-sufficiency.

Feasibility:
This model is highly feasible, particularly with the support of international funding and technical expertise. A pilot project could focus on regions with optimal conditions for solar and wind energy production. Next steps would include building infrastructure for energy distribution and developing a framework for monitoring progress.

💡 32. Education and Digitalisation

Concept/Metaphor:
“A Digital Bridge to the Future” – creating educational and digital opportunities for all Ukrainian citizens to ensure equitable access to modern technologies, education, and employment opportunities, thereby strengthening the economy and improving quality of life.

How It Would Work:

• Creation of Online Educational Platforms: These platforms would focus on improving the digital skills of youth, teachers, and the workforce. Courses would cover a wide range of topics, such as programming, digital marketing, online communication, and other skills essential for the modern job market. Accessible to the general public regardless of location, these platforms would offer flexible learning options.
  Example: An online platform enabling individuals in remote areas to acquire essential digital skills for modern careers.
• Investment in Digital Infrastructure: Development would include improving internet connectivity in rural and remote areas, modernising schools, hospitals, and businesses. Teachers and students would have access to advanced technologies, such as interactive whiteboards, tablets, and computers, fostering modern and interactive teaching methods.
  Example: Expanding 5G and high-speed internet to educational institutions and rural areas, ensuring equal access to modern technologies.
• Programmes for Digital Transformation in Public Administration: These initiatives would promote the adoption of digital tools and processes in government, streamlining administrative procedures, improving access to public services, and enhancing transparency. This would include training officials, implementing digital payment systems, e-applications, and citizen digital identification.
  Example: Implementation of e-Government systems and digital payment options to simplify processes for citizens and government alike.

External Relationships:

• Partnerships with Universities, Technology Firms, and International Organisations: Universities and tech companies would provide expertise and skills development, while international organisations would support funding and technical assistance for digital infrastructure and workforce training.
• Support from the EU and Regional Institutions: The European Union and other regional organisations could offer technical and financial support to enhance digital capacities, enabling the implementation of modern technologies and ensuring high-quality education at all levels.

Value:
This concept ensures quality and accessible education for young people, empowering them to participate in the digital economy. Strengthening digital infrastructure for education, healthcare, and businesses will have long-term benefits for governance and economic growth. This approach creates better employment opportunities and fosters innovation while supporting sustainable development in the digital era.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The Education and Digitalisation concept transcends traditional education models by prioritising digital transformation and equal access to technology for all citizens. It improves skills for future generations and the current workforce, driving long-term growth.

Feasibility:
This model is feasible with growing international support for sustainable economic tools and diplomatic initiatives. A pilot project could begin on a smaller scale, focusing on specific regions or partnerships between Ukraine and EU member states. Further steps would involve defining policy and economic conditions for implementation and developing a framework for monitoring progress.

💡 33. War Refugee Repatriation Programme

Concept/Metaphor:
“The Path Home” – a comprehensive programme aimed at the safe return of Ukrainian refugees and the restoration of their lives in secure conditions. It includes humanitarian aid, logistical support, and projects for long-term stabilisation and reintegration into a recovering Ukraine.

How It Would Work:

• Facilitating Return: The programme would ensure refugees’ safe return to secure areas of Ukraine through humanitarian aid, logistical support, and rehabilitation projects. This would include transport arrangements and assistance with administrative processes such as visas and travel permits.
  Example: Coordinating transport and providing support for visa and permit acquisition to facilitate smooth returns to safe regions.
• Providing Basic Needs: Refugees would be guaranteed access to housing, healthcare, and education upon their return. Support in these areas would help returnees adapt and reintegrate into peaceful conditions as quickly as possible.
  Example: Temporary housing and healthcare services for returnees, along with access to education for children.
• Rehabilitation Projects: The programme would also focus on rehabilitating damaged areas and rebuilding community structures. This includes creating job opportunities, developing local infrastructure, and ensuring long-term stability for returnees in their original or new homes.
  Example: Funding infrastructure projects, employment opportunities, and community services to stabilise life for returnees.

External Relationships:

• Partnerships with International Organisations: Collaborations with organisations like UNHCR would ensure coordination, expertise, and resources for effective implementation.
• Collaboration with Refugee-Hosting Countries: Partnerships with countries hosting refugees would facilitate integration and a smooth transition back to Ukraine. This includes sharing information, coordinating between governments, and supporting refugees both abroad and during repatriation.

Value:
The programme ensures the safe return of refugees to their homeland and supports their reintegration into a rebuilding Ukraine. It addresses urgent humanitarian issues while fostering long-term stabilisation and recovery. By preventing prolonged humanitarian crises, the programme lays the groundwork for lasting peace, stability, and development.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The War Refugee Repatriation Programme goes beyond traditional humanitarian approaches by integrating comprehensive support for returnees with long-term rehabilitation and stabilisation efforts. It addresses economic stabilisation and access to basic needs alongside logistical and administrative assistance.

Feasibility:
This model is feasible through collaborations with international organisations and governments. A pilot project could start in areas deemed safe for return, with well-coordinated logistics. Next steps include securing funding and defining a clear framework for distributing aid and coordinating among stakeholders.

💡 34. Peace Diplomacy Fund

Concept/Metaphor:
“An Investment in Peace” – a fund dedicated to financing and supporting diplomatic and peace initiatives aimed at ending conflict and achieving lasting peace. This fund focuses on facilitating peace negotiations between Ukraine, Russia, and international stakeholders, helping to stabilise the region and lay the groundwork for long-term peace.

How It Would Work:

• Funding Diplomatic Initiatives: The fund would provide financial support for peace negotiations and diplomatic missions between Ukraine, Russia, and other international actors. This would include not only ceasefire agreements but also long-term political arrangements to ensure regional stability and recovery.
  Example: The fund would finance peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, as well as long-term agreements guaranteeing stability and reconstruction.
• Support for Independent Mediators and Experts: The fund would finance independent mediators and peace process experts to facilitate ceasefire negotiations and sustainable peace agreements. This support would include legal experts, humanitarian organisations, and other specialists ensuring fair and lasting outcomes.
  Example: Funding mediators and experts to ensure impartial and effective negotiations for equitable peace resolutions.
• Monitoring and Implementation of Peace Agreements: The fund would also support mechanisms for monitoring and implementing peace agreements. This would involve deploying international observers and creating transparent mechanisms to ensure compliance with the agreements.
  Example: International observers would be deployed to conflict-affected areas to ensure adherence to peace agreements and establish transparent monitoring systems.

External Relationships:

• Collaboration with International Organisations: The fund would work with international organisations such as the United Nations, European Union, and other diplomatic entities with experience and resources to support peace negotiations. These organisations would provide valuable diplomatic expertise and legitimacy to the peace process.
• Partnerships with Peace Negotiation Experts: In addition to major organisations, the fund would collaborate with independent experts in peace negotiations to contribute to effective and impartial processes. International specialists and peace organisations would play a key role in ensuring that the negotiation process remains independent, fair, and transparent.

Value:
The Peace Diplomacy Fund would support diplomatic efforts to end the war and achieve lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia. This approach would include broad international support, increasing pressure on both sides to honour peace agreements and prevent further conflict. Additionally, the fund would aid Ukraine’s long-term post-conflict stabilisation, foster political recovery, and prepare the country for sustained peace and stability. By supporting negotiation, monitoring, and implementation of agreements, the fund ensures that any achieved settlements are upheld and maintained.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
This model redefines traditional diplomatic approaches by focusing on sustained funding for peace processes and negotiations. Ensuring a transparent and impartial process through independent experts and international organisations provides this model with a strong foundation for success.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible due to extensive international support for diplomatic initiatives and existing global channels for peace negotiations. A pilot project could begin in smaller areas or specific regions prepared for peace discussions. Further steps would include detailed planning for fund management and the implementation of monitoring mechanisms.

💡 35. Peaceful Sustainable Development Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Energy for Peace” – an economic model focused on investments, trade relationships, and diplomacy to promote sustainable peace and stable development instead of ongoing conflict. This model emphasises shared responsibility for peace through international cooperation, economic tools, and innovative approaches to conflict resolution.

How It Would Work:

• Peaceful Trade Pact: Creation of an international trade agreement between Ukraine, Russia, the EU, and other states, where economic benefits are conditional upon compliance with peace agreements. This pact would incentivise states to resolve disputes diplomatically, with economic opportunities (e.g., access to markets, energy, and finance) directly tied to progress in the peace process.
  Example: Russia would gain better access to Western markets if it ceased military aggression and engaged in diplomatic solutions. Ukraine would participate in the pact to foster regional stability and peaceful development.
• Investments in Peace Infrastructure: Establishment of an international fund to finance recovery and peace infrastructure projects in war-affected areas. The fund would support initiatives such as renewable energy facilities, hospitals, schools, and other critical infrastructure.
  Example: The fund would finance rebuilding affected regions in Ukraine, including solar and wind farms to ensure energy independence and reduce reliance on Russian supplies.
• Conditional Economic Sanctions: Introduction of a new approach to economic sanctions, where sanctions would be eased or lifted only upon concrete progress in the peace process. This would provide a direct economic incentive for countries like Russia to engage in peace negotiations.
  Example: Russia would have an economic interest in initiating peace talks, as sanctions would be gradually lifted if conflict ceased and peace processes advanced.
• Peace Currency and Financial Systems: Development of a digital “peace currency” for trade among nations committed to peace agreements. The value of this currency would be linked to progress in peace efforts, directly connecting economic relationships with diplomacy and sustainable peace.
  Example: This digital currency would be used for trade between Ukraine, Russia, and European states, with its value increasing as peace goals are met.
• Peace Education and Cultural Bridges: Development of cultural and educational exchange programmes aimed at fostering understanding, communication, and dialogue among nations. These exchanges would build relationships among youth from Ukraine, Russia, and other involved states, enabling them to study history, culture, and peace diplomacy.
  Example: International youth programmes would promote mutual learning about history, culture, and peace diplomacy, helping eliminate biases and facilitate reconciliation.

External Relationships:

• International Economic Sanctions: Western nations, international organisations, and coalitions would coordinate sanctions that are strictly conditional. Sanctions would be eased only if Russia halted military actions and began diplomatic discussions.
• Economic Integration: Russia would gain access to international trade networks and technological advancements only if it fulfilled peace conditions, fostering positive incentives for diplomatic solutions.
• Diplomatic Cooperation: Active negotiations and collaborations with organisations such as the UN, EU, and NATO would support peace discussions and regional stabilisation.

Governance and Ownership:
The model would be managed by international organisations such as the UN, EU, and NATO, coordinating sanctions, investments, and trade agreements. The peace infrastructure fund would oversee financing and project management, while the peace currency would be controlled by international financial institutions.

Value:
This model applies economic pressure to end aggression while offering diplomatic and economic benefits for transitioning to peace. By connecting diplomatic agreements with economic advantages, it fosters a peaceful and sustainable solution, transforming conflict regions into opportunities for development and stability.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The model integrates economic, technological, and cultural tools into a single framework for achieving peace. Combining sanctions with positive incentives such as infrastructure investments and cultural exchanges offers a novel approach to conflict resolution.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible due to growing international support for sustainable economic tools and diplomatic initiatives. A pilot project could begin with a focus on key trade and technology areas between Ukraine, Russia, and EU states. Further steps would include developing the peace currency and implementing sanctions and incentives.

This economic model balances sanctions, diplomatic incentives, and economic benefits to support long-term peace and regional stabilisation. It creates strong pressure for Russia to cease aggression while ensuring sustainable opportunities for future cooperation.

💡 36. Mutual Dependency and Transitional Cooperation Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Cooperation or Isolation” – an economic model focusing on mutual dependency and economic sanctions as a tool to motivate Russia to end its aggression and engage in regional stabilisation. The model includes transitional economic cooperation, offering Russia benefits in exchange for ceasing aggression.

How It Would Work:

• Isolationist Economic Bloc: Western nations (EU, USA, Japan, Canada) would form an economic bloc aimed at excluding Russia from global trade and financial systems. Sanctions would include removal from the SWIFT system, bans on technology trade, and restricted access to international financial institutions, leading to economic destabilisation and internal crises.
  Example: If Russia continued military actions, it would be barred from the SWIFT system, severely hampering trade and causing economic turmoil.
• Peaceful Integration Pact: Russia would be offered the opportunity to join international trade agreements and technological alliances, such as with the EU or NATO, but only if it met peace conditions. This pact would grant Russia access to Western markets, technological innovations, and energy resources.
  Example: If Russia ended its invasion, it would be invited to join a “Peaceful Trade Zone,” opening new investment opportunities.
• Energy Threat and Opportunity: Russia would face the risk of losing influence in the global energy market. Instead, it would be incentivised to cooperate on renewable energy projects and technological innovations, with access to Western expertise and investments contingent on participating in peace processes.
  Example: The EU would finance renewable energy projects in Russia if the country committed to peace initiatives.
• Digital Peace System: Creation of a new digital currency for trade among participating states. The currency’s value would be tied to adherence to peace agreements and efforts to stabilise the region, creating economic pressure on Russia to end military activities.
  Example: If Russia fulfilled peace conditions, it would gain access to the digital peace system, facilitating trade and regional economic stability.
• Joint Peace Education Programmes: Establishment of programmes for young people from Ukraine, Russia, and other involved nations to collaborate on peace and economic initiatives. These programmes would aim to build long-term dialogue and foster reconciliation between nations.
  Example: Joint educational projects would focus on culture, history, and diplomacy, enhancing mutual understanding between nations.

External Relationships:

• International Economic Sanctions: Western countries and international organisations would coordinate sanctions strictly tied to conditions. Sanctions would be lifted only if Russia ceased military actions and initiated diplomatic talks.
• Economic Integration: Russia would gain access to international trade and technology networks only if it fulfilled peace conditions, providing a positive incentive for diplomatic resolution.
• Diplomatic Cooperation: Active negotiations and collaboration with organisations such as the UN, EU, and NATO would support peace talks and regional stabilisation.

Governance and Ownership:
The model would be overseen by global international organisations and coalitions (e.g., EU, UN, NATO), which would implement sanctions and negotiate peace terms. Peace agreements and trade pacts would be jointly managed to ensure regional stability.

Value:

• Economic Pressure to End Aggression: This model uses economic isolation as the primary tool to compel Russia to abandon aggressive actions and transition to diplomatic solutions, leading to peace and stability.
• Peaceful Transition to Sustainability: Combining diplomatic and economic incentives would encourage long-term peace solutions, transforming conflict regions into opportunities for development and stability.
• International Responsibility: This model promotes international solidarity and responsibility for ensuring peace and stabilisation, reducing the likelihood of conflict escalation and enhancing global stability.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The model combines economic sanctions with positive incentive mechanisms for achieving peace. It not only focuses on isolation but also offers alternative opportunities for Russia, making the approach innovative and potentially effective in the current geopolitical climate. The integration of digital currency and modern technological solutions provides a new dimension to conflict resolution and stabilisation.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible due to broad international support for coordinated sanctions and a new global economic alliance. Pilot projects could target key trade and technological sectors between Ukraine, Russia, and EU nations. Next steps include developing the digital currency and implementing sanctions and incentives.

This economic model balances sanctions, diplomatic motivation, and economic benefits to promote long-term peace and regional stability. It creates strong pressure for Russia to end its aggression while ensuring sustainable opportunities for future cooperation.

💡 37. Isolation Sanctions and New Global Alliances Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Exclusion and Reconstruction” – an economic model leveraging the strategy of isolating the aggressor (Russia) from international trade, finance, and technological innovation, while establishing a new global economic alliance fully aligned with Ukraine and its allies. The model focuses on political and economic isolation to pressure Russia into abandoning its aggressive policies and adopting diplomatic solutions.

How It Would Work:

• Global Economic Blockade: Russia would be excluded from international trade and financial systems. It would be banned from using SWIFT, denied market access, and prohibited from interacting with international financial institutions (IMF, World Bank). This isolation would lead to economic decline, inflation, reduced living standards, and internal destabilisation, pressuring Russia to pursue peace.
  Example: Russia would be barred from international financial institutions, leading to economic collapse and a necessity for peace negotiations.
• International Energy Zone Without Russia: Russia would be excluded from global energy cooperation. Instead, Ukraine, the EU, and the USA would form a new energy pact focused on renewables, LNG, and alternative energy sources, reducing Russian influence on European energy markets.
  Example: Ukraine would become a hub for alternative energy projects in Europe, eliminating Russian control over European energy supplies.
• Global Technological Embargo: Russia would lose access to modern technologies such as AI, 5G, and renewables. Ukraine and its allies would gain technological support, enhancing their geopolitical and economic influence.
  Example: Russia would be excluded from global technology and production chains, while Ukraine would become a leader in new technologies.
• Diplomatic Exclusion: Russia would be excluded from international organisations such as the UN and G20, limiting its influence on global diplomatic processes. Ukraine and its allies would create a new framework for international stability and reconstruction.
  Example: Russia’s exclusion from diplomatic negotiations would empower Ukraine and its allies to establish new stabilisation mechanisms.
• Alternative Trade Agreements for Ukraine: Ukraine, the EU, USA, and other allies would establish new trade agreements, positioning Ukraine as a centre for a new trade and technology model. This cooperation would drive Ukraine’s economic growth and diminish Russia’s influence on trade relationships.
  Example: Ukraine would become a key trade partner for the EU and USA, strengthening its geopolitical and economic position globally.

External Relationships:

• Coordinated Sanctions and Isolation: The international community (EU, USA, Japan, Canada) would coordinate systematic sanctions targeting economic, technological, and diplomatic isolation.
• Cooperation with New Economic Blocs: Establishment of new trade and energy pacts to support stability and diversify energy and technology sources away from Russian influence.
• Diplomatic Collaboration: Active diplomatic support for Ukraine and its cooperation with organisations such as the UN, EU, and NATO would be critical for ensuring peace and regional stability.

Governance and Ownership:
The model would be managed by international organisations and coalitions such as the EU, NATO, and UN. Key decisions on sanctions, diplomacy, and trade agreements would be made collaboratively to achieve consensus among Ukraine’s supporters. Establishing new alliances and trade pacts would be essential for effective implementation.

Value:

• Economic Isolation as a Behaviour Change Tool: This model uses economic isolation as the primary tool to force Russia to end aggressive actions. Economic pressure would lead to necessary steps toward peace and stabilisation.
• Support for Alternative Alliances: Creation of new trade and technology alliances supporting stability and aiding Ukraine’s recovery, reducing Russia’s influence and strengthening Ukraine’s independence.
• International Responsibility: This model strengthens international solidarity and accountability for resolving conflicts peacefully, helping stabilise the global economy and reducing the risk of conflict escalation.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
This model innovatively integrates economic, technological, and energy tools with traditional sanctions and diplomatic exclusion. Its focus on alternative trade pacts and a new digital economy introduces a novel approach to geopolitical and economic strategy.

Feasibility:
The model is feasible through international coordination and existing tools such as sanctions, trade alliances, and technology initiatives. Pilot projects focusing on key trade and technology sectors between Ukraine, Russia, and EU nations could be implemented in the short term. Further steps include developing new trade agreements and advancing the implementation of a digital peace currency.

This model balances economic isolation with alternative economic opportunities, fostering long-term peace and stabilisation while promoting Ukraine’s growth and reducing Russian influence.

💡 38. Economy of Destruction and Reorganisation: Total Isolation with Global Interest Transformation

Concept/Metaphor:
“Global Reset – A Restart for Peace” – a radical economic model aimed at achieving global peace through the complete economic isolation of Russia and the reconfiguration of global economic and geopolitical relations. This model involves excluding Russia entirely from international trade, finance, and technology processes, leading to economic destabilisation and a geopolitical transformation of the region.

External Relationships:
The establishment of new international alliances among Ukraine, the EU, the USA, and other nations would lead to the creation of a new geopolitical and economic system, excluding Russia. This model includes comprehensive economic isolation of Russia and its removal from global processes. New trade and technology alliances would foster stability for Ukraine and its allies.
Example: Ukraine would emerge as a hub for global technological innovation, with its economic and diplomatic relations supported by a new global political framework.

Governance and Ownership:
This model would create a new governance structure for managing global trade and technological relationships. Ukraine, the EU, and the USA would coordinate new political and economic platforms founded on principles of stability, recovery, and peace. A decentralised economy based on digital currencies and blockchain would enable new trade models between participating states while isolating Russia.

Value:
This model offers an opportunity for global economic reorganisation, establishing a stable peace system and fostering new trade and technological alliances among nations within a parallel system. This approach has the potential to reshape global geopolitics by excluding aggressive states from international commerce and creating new, stable economic relationships.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The model is innovative in that it does not merely enhance traditional sanction methods but creates a parallel system that is technologically and economically detached from states supporting aggression. Establishing new trade routes, energy pacts, and technological alliances pushes the boundaries of global relations. Such an approach could redefine the principles of global trade and geopolitics.

Feasibility:
This model is feasible thanks to existing technological capabilities such as blockchain and digital currencies. International cooperation among Ukraine, the EU, the USA, and other nations would be crucial for implementing a parallel economic and diplomatic system that isolates Russia. Political and economic exclusion of Russia could be effectively executed with sufficient global support for this radical approach.

💡 39. Global Peace Assurance and Military Conflict Elimination Economy

Concept/Metaphor:
“Zero Tolerance for Wars” – a radical economic model aimed at achieving global peace and eliminating military conflicts. The goal is to delegitimise military aggression through economic tools that make warfare unsustainable in terms of costs and impacts. The model emphasises diplomatic solutions, peaceful trade relationships, and the isolation of aggressors.

External Relationships:
The model establishes global economic alliances focused on promoting peace and diplomatic processes. States adhering to peace agreements gain access to preferential trade conditions, investments, and technological partnerships, while aggressors face total economic isolation.
Example: A global sanctions system would immediately suspend trade and financial transactions with any state initiating military aggression.

Governance and Ownership:
Economic tools such as peace funds and sanctions systems would be managed by international organisations, such as a reformed United Nations or new global economic coalitions. Decision-making processes would be transparent and democratic, involving a wide range of states and non-governmental actors.

Value:
This model supports economic stability, strengthens diplomatic conflict resolution, and ensures global security. Resources are redirected from military spending to sustainable development, ecological innovation, and societal progress.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The peace economy redefines global relationships by eliminating the economic incentives for war. It introduces global systems of sanctions and economic embargoes that immediately isolate aggressors. Innovative elements such as peace trade pacts or digital currencies tied to peace goals provide a novel approach to ensuring stability.

Feasibility:
Pilot implementation could begin at the regional level or within specific trade blocs that apply peace sanctions and trade agreements. Global adoption would require strong international cooperation and coordination.

Additional Benefits:
The model contributes to ecological sustainability and technological development through investments in peace projects. It promotes a fairer international economic system where diplomatic cooperation is a priority.

💡 40. Global Peace Transformation Economy and UN Reform

Concept/Metaphor:
“A New Peace Order” – a global economic model linking United Nations reform with radical changes to international economic relations. The aim is to ensure that military conflicts become economically unsustainable and politically unacceptable. The UN would transform into a key player in global peace and stability economics.

External Relationships:
The UN would strengthen its role as a regulator of the global economy, coordinating peace trade agreements and marginalising aggressors through economic sanctions. States adhering to peace agreements would gain access to preferential trade and investment conditions.
Example: A global peace fund would finance post-conflict recovery and ecological projects in affected regions.

Governance and Ownership:
A reformed UN would include specialised economic bodies managing funds, trade alliances, and sanction systems. Decision-making would be decentralised, with member states participating in transparent processes overseen by the UN.

Value:
Economic stability replaces military aggression. The system supports global peace platforms and ecological recovery, contributing to long-term stability and sustainability.

Uniqueness and Innovation:
The model transforms the UN’s role into that of an economic regulator while introducing new economic tools such as peace trade agreements, sanctions, and global investment funds. This approach eliminates military conflicts by making them economically unviable.

Feasibility:
Gradual implementation of UN reforms and pilot projects, such as a peace fund or specific trade alliances, would allow for testing at a regional level. Significant political and technical challenges could be addressed through international cooperation and the involvement of key stakeholders.

---

⚖️🕵️‍♂️ Ethical Hacking

Here is the British English translation of the requested text:

---

💡 41. The Economy of Ethical Hacking for Digital Peace and Justice

Concept/Metaphor:
“Digital Revolution for a Just World” – a revolutionary model that places ethical hacking at the centre of the digital economy. Ethical hacking acts as a tool to reshape the digital space, eliminate unethical practices, and promote global justice. This approach redefines the role of hackers as protectors and active agents of change, ensuring that digital technologies advance equality, justice, and ecological sustainability.

External Relationships:

• International Coalition for Digital Ethics: A global partnership of states, non-profit organisations, and technology firms to develop standards for digital justice and privacy protection.
• Support for Community Hacktivist Projects: Funding initiatives focused on data transparency, privacy protection, and combating monopolistic practices through a global digital ethics fund.
• Digital Education: Partnerships between hackers and academic institutions to create educational programmes on ethical technologies and promote the democratisation of digital skills.

Governance and Ownership:

• Decentralised Platforms: Community-owned digital infrastructure managed through blockchain to ensure transparency and equitable decision-making.
• Global Digital Peace Economy Fund: A fund dedicated to financing ethical digital projects, supporting initiatives for data protection, ecological renewal, and education.
• Digital Currency “PeaceCoin”: A new currency exclusively used for transactions meeting ethical and environmental standards.

Value:

• Digital Freedom: Users have full control over their data and interactions, with technology fostering equality and independence.
• Ethical Hacking as a Catalyst for Change: Hacking becomes a vital tool for dismantling unethical business models and manipulation in the digital space.
• Social and Environmental Impact: The economy supports global projects that contribute to sustainability, climate protection, and equality.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The model links ethical hacking to economic processes, redefining the values of the digital economy towards responsibility and equality.
• Technological Dimension: AI and blockchain ensure security, fairness, and transparency throughout the ecosystem.
• Ethical Framework: Every project and transaction undergoes an ethical audit, reinforcing trust and accountability.

Feasibility:
Pilot projects can begin in digitally progressive communities or through open-source platforms focused on privacy protection. Initial steps include introducing digital currency and developing decentralised platforms to promote transparency and ethical business models. A global digital ethics fund could provide financial support for hacktivist projects and educational programmes.

Practical Applications:

• Digital Currency “PeaceCoin”: Used by companies that meet stringent ethical standards and invest in sustainable projects.
• Digital Transparency Platform: Hacker communities expose unethical corporate practices and receive financial backing from the digital justice fund.
• Educational and Awareness Programmes: Ethical hacking academies train new experts in digital justice and autonomy.

Uniqueness and Future Potential:
This model transforms traditional principles of the digital economy by prioritising responsibility and ethics. Ethical hacking becomes a driving force for creating an equitable and sustainable digital space that supports economic growth while enhancing social and ecological stability. The model presents a radical yet achievable vision of a digital economy centred on global good.

💡 42. The Economy of Digital Autonomy: Hacking for Global Freedom and Justice

Concept/Metaphor:
“Digital Freedom in Action” – a new economic model combining ethical hacking, decentralisation, and digital autonomy to ensure a fair and free digital space. This system prioritises privacy protection, user control over personal data, and the elimination of monopolistic practices by tech giants. Ethical hacking forms the foundation, not only safeguarding but actively transforming the digital economy towards sustainability and justice.

External Relationships:

• International Coalition for Digital Freedom: A global alliance of states, non-profit organisations, and digital communities working to implement standards for privacy, transparency, and ethics in the digital realm.
• Partnerships with Academic Institutions: Ethical hacker groups collaborate with universities and research centres to develop ethical frameworks for digital technologies and educational programmes promoting technological independence.
• Global Fund for Digital Autonomy: A fund supporting projects focused on decentralised technologies, educational initiatives, and the protection of digital rights.

Governance and Ownership:
The model promotes decentralised digital infrastructure owned and governed by communities. Every user participates in decision-making through blockchain-based voting mechanisms. Autonomous digital communities are established, sharing resources and supporting their members.

Value:

• Digital Autonomy: Users gain full control over their data, digital tools, and interactions.
• Ethical Hacking: Ethical hacking serves as a tool to dismantle manipulative practices and promote transparency and justice in the digital economy.
• Sustainability and Justice: Digital tools support ecological and social projects globally.

Uniqueness and Innovation:

• Originality: The concept redefines the digital economy by replacing traditional profit-driven models with a decentralised, community-led system.
• Technological Innovations: AI and blockchain ensure security, transparency, and efficiency. Decentralised tools reduce dependency on monopolistic platforms and promote both local and global collaboration.
• Challenges: Political resistance and technical hurdles may slow implementation. Pilot projects within smaller communities can help overcome initial barriers.

Feasibility:
Pilot projects could launch in digitally active communities or universities that already utilise open-source tools and support technological independence. Developing the first version of a decentralised platform, focused on data protection or alternative digital currencies, could demonstrate the model’s practical viability.

Example Application:
A community creates its own digital platform enabling secure transactions and data sharing without exploitation by commercial entities. Ethical hacker groups regularly audit the platform to address potential security threats. Users employ “PeaceCoin,” a digital currency supporting projects in ecology and education.

Future Potential:
This model transforms the digital world into a fairer, more sustainable, and ethical space where everyone has the right to digital sovereignty. It offers not only technological solutions but also a new ethical framework for the digital economy.

---

The Path to Selection

I am aware that in the next phase of the Double Diamond process—the convergent stage—I will need to decide which of these directions to develop into a concrete form. This selection will not be easy, as I consider all these areas to be essential and inspiring. Nevertheless, I trust that a careful analysis, the interconnection of ideas, and their potential value will guide me towards a direction worth further elaboration.

---

Before me lies a wealth of possibilities, opening up diverse perspectives—from personal passions to professional experiences and global challenges. This diversity is not a hindrance but rather an opportunity to create a meaningful and bold concept.

---

Sources

• Images: The images used in the article were created using DALL·E, an AI generator by OpenAI.
• Icons: The icons were created using DALL·E, based on the prompt:
  Generate five icons on the topic of [topic] using Unicode escape sequences.
• Topic Compilation: The set of topics was created using a “sticky note” method, where fundamental ideas were written down and then manually elaborated upon in individual cases. For further revisions and text development, the ChatGPT model (version 4.0) by OpenAI was used iteratively. The topics were developed based on the author’s experience in areas such as LGBTQIA+, cybersecurity, and other related fields. Within the LGBTQIA+ theme, a key source of inspiration was the article “The Queery: Cooperative Model and Community Engagement”, available at https://www.silenceplease.cz/the-queery-kooperativni-model-a-komunitni-zapojeni/.
• Academic Source: Mesarčík, P., & Zbiejczuk Suchá, L. (2024). DESB51 Business as Unusual [Lectures and Study Materials]. Masaryk University.